Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
It can't be fun being a pro-Russian military blogger. Your nation and its military have been revealed to be inept. When Crimea falls to Ukraine they're going to howl.Russian military blogger and pro-Russian social media sources are saying
It's estimated that Red Army has lost around 85000 Tanks during WW2.1,500 new and modernised tanks - really?
In March 2023 Dmitry Medvedev claimed that Russian tank production would reach 1,500. But is this claim credible? And could Russia do it?wavellroom.com
One particular sentence caught my eye. "Total tank losses at the time of writing stand at over 1,900, or the inventories of several NATO armies. Twenty years of industrial effort has been turned into an iron mountain of junk."
1900 is a lot if you don't have a big number to start with.It's estimated that Red Army has lost around 85000 Tanks during WW2.
1900 is literally nothing!!! They were a fan of quantity over quality policy for as long as I can remember.
I never trusted those "top 10 Army rankings"...1900 is a lot if you don't have a big number to start with.
The Red Army's losses of 85,000 tanks were out of a total tank Red Army WW2 strength of about 109,000 tanks produced or acquired. Meaning the Red Army lost about 78% of their tanks from June 1941 to May 1945. Looking at today, from what I've read the Russians had 2,500 tanks before they invaded Ukraine in Feb 2022. If they have lost 1,900 tanks since then, the loss rate of 76% is close to the WW2 rate. However, unlike during WW2 with massive factories and Lend Lease keeping the Red Army well stocked, today's Russians don't the ability to replace lost tanks with new tanks.
1900 was nothing in WW2 but its a lot in 2020. WWII tanks can't be compared to 2020 tanks and Russia 2020 can't be compared to Soviet Union 1945It's estimated that Red Army has lost around 85000 Tanks during WW2.
1900 is literally nothing!!! They were a fan of quantity over quality policy for as long as I can remember.
I never trusted those "top 10 Army rankings"...
Here is "why". Numbers can be deceiving.
Do not forget the Red Army received 13 000 tanks through Lend Lease.1900 is a lot if you don't have a big number to start with.
The Red Army's losses of 85,000 tanks were out of a total tank Red Army WW2 strength of about 109,000 tanks produced or acquired. Meaning the Red Army lost about 78% of their tanks from June 1941 to May 1945. Looking at today, from what I've read the Russians had 2,500 tanks before they invaded Ukraine in Feb 2022. If they have lost 1,900 tanks since then, the loss rate of 76% is close to the WW2 rate. However, unlike during WW2 with massive factories and Lend Lease keeping the Red Army well stocked, today's Russians don't the ability to replace lost tanks with new tanks.
Actually, she fully expected this. I thought she was kind of joking, but she wasn't.I gave a bacon on your comment, but its for your mother.
How are the Ukrainians keeping their preparations for the counteroffensive secret? The Russians have reconnaissance satellites (hmm.. there were fifteen ASM-135 ASAT produced - time for a MiG-29 upgrade?) that should be able to see any large groupings of Leopard 2, Challenger 2, PT-91s, Bradleys and Marders anywhere in the country, and especially within striking distance of the front line. This many Leopard 2s will get noticed, for example...
View attachment 718705
It has to annoy Russia that US satellites must be sitting in geostatic orbit or otherwise frequently overhead reporting everything (that Washington wants to share) to Kyiv and NATO.Russia has 2 problems related to satellites:
In the late 70's the RAF reportedly used a half finished supermarket as a base for Harriers during one exercise. With the open space inside the building and the car park to launch from it was close to perfect.There's also the perennial challenge of whether the tanks are visible. Put a tank inside a building and can no longer be seen. How many fire stations, garages etc could be repurposed as temporary tank "hides" even in relatively forward areas?