Some people just don't get that and will do everything they can to stop the support in their bid to support Russia.Also a lot, if not most of the money is being spent in the USA. In Iraq and Afghanistan a sizable proportion was spent overseas.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Some people just don't get that and will do everything they can to stop the support in their bid to support Russia.Also a lot, if not most of the money is being spent in the USA. In Iraq and Afghanistan a sizable proportion was spent overseas.
As long as Russia's forces can be ejected from Ukraine, including Crimea I think Russia can thereafter be contained. By 2025 Ukraine will have a larger tank army than Russia.Victory is imposing one's will upon the enemy in such a manner that the ensuing peace is manageable, imo. In that sense, Ukrainian victory may or may not be attainable. I believe they can win on the battlefield, but I'm not sure they can inflict a defeat upon the Russians to the extent that Russian foreign policy will abandon the drive to resurrect the Soviet empire.
As long as Russia's forces can be ejected from Ukraine, including Crimea I think Russia can thereafter be contained. By 2025 Ukraine will have a larger tank army than Russia.
Goodness this is some low flying.
View: https://twitter.com/kpszsu/status/1658044081866457088?s=61&t=bmtNxWabcsIKJ6TkHkd-SA
If after an armistice, Russia can find anything they can call a victory, perhaps holding onto Crimea….their next target is clear. Ukraine, part 3. In theatres 2030.The question that some people should be considering is what will be the next target if Russia ends up winning this war in any way shape or form
Putin is resorting more and more to Stalin tactics. Who's next on the purge list?May 17 (Reuters) - Three Russian academics who have worked on hypersonic missile technology face "very serious accusations", the Kremlin said on Wednesday, in a treason investigation that has spread alarm through Russia's scientific community.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said he was aware of an open letter from Siberian scientists in defence of the men, but that the case was a matter for the security services.
In the letter, published on Monday, colleagues of Anatoly Maslov, Alexander Shiplyuk and Valery Zvegintsev protested their innocence and said the prosecutions threatened to inflict grave damage on Russian science.
[...]
It said such cases were having a chilling effect on young Russian scientists.
"Even now, the best students refuse to come to work with us, and our best young employees are leaving science. A number of research areas that are critically important to laying the fundamental groundwork for the aerospace technology of the future are simply closing because employees are afraid to engage in such research."[/i]
![]()
Russia says hypersonic missile scientists face 'very serious' treason accusations
Three Russian academics who have worked on hypersonic missile technology face "very serious accusations", the Kremlin said on Wednesday, in a treason investigation that has spread alarm through Russia's scientific community.www.reuters.com
The Russians would seem to be taking a big gamble, stripping other sectors of higher-quality troops to reinforce a grinding front with little promise of meaningful results.
This really feels like Ukraine setting conditions for their big offensive. Drawing forces into Bakhmut, and thereby denuding defences elsewhere, is a great precondition before going on the offensive in those other areas.
From sectors where they would be more urgently required. They remain Master Strategists.Exactly why I think this is such a gamble for the Russians. I wonder which sectors those airborne troops are coming from?
Exactly why I think this is such a gamble for the Russians. I wonder which sectors those airborne troops are coming from?
Am thinking it's more of a recipe for a 'Night of the Long Knives' kind of episode: starving the Wagner forces in the field of resources to maximize their losses, maybe a few 'friendly fire' incidents on the front lines, then a decapitation to remove Wagner leadership. Followed by assimilation of any rank-and-file into the Russian ArmyWherever they're from, it's a stupid move by the Russians. Bakhmut has never been a strategically or operationally significant objective and yet they continue to funnel resources into it.
I just cannot fathom why they're focusing so much on Bakhmut...unless there are political overtones, with Putin fearing the fallout if the Russian military pulls back from the area, gifting Prigozhin another opportunity to undermine his former boss.
Seems pretty clear to me that Prigozhin has aspirations beyond being the boss of Wagner. He's certainly not shy about criticizing Putin...and he has the military muscle to back him up.
Anyone taking bets on the likelihood of civil war in Russia within the next 5 years?
Am thinking it's more of a recipe for a 'Night of the Long Knives' kind of episode: starving the Wagner forces in the field of resources to maximize their losses, maybe a few 'friendly fire' incidents on the front lines, then a decapitation to remove Wagner leadership. Followed by assimilation of any rank-and-file into the Russian Army
www.thedefensepost.com