Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I think many/most European/NATO (and beyond - Australia for example) nations realise that an increase in Defence spending /capability/capacity is required. Look at recent comments from NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte calling for increased spending. The issue with comments from trump though is that they carry an implied "or else" (anyone need reminding re his comments re encouraging Russia to do"whatever the hell they want"?) This is the part (especially when combined with other comments) that in unacceptable and comes across as blackmail. Mobster diplomacy is unacceptable.We should be in a period of serious rearmament, not apathy and complacent 'business and assumption as normal'. I can't see how that can be any less obvious. The parallels to the 1930s seem clear enough to me.
Frightening. Won't the world be more fun when this tech is more readily available?Robots replace infantry in Ukraine’s Kharkiv offensive
The Ukrainian Armed Forces carried out a ground attack without deploying infantry, relying solely on unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) and first-person view (FPV) drones for the first time. The breakthrough operation occurred near Lyptsi in the Kharkiv region, according to a press release from the...defence-blog.com
We either shift for ourselves on defence then - or do nothing and risk seeing America withdraw interest, commitment and money and like Europe in the 30s, do too little, too late and in an uncoordinated way.I think many/most European/NATO (and beyond - Australia for example) nations realise that an increase in Defence spending /capability/capacity is required. Look at recent comments from NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte calling for increased spending. The issue with comments from trump though is that they carry an implied "or else" (anyone need reminding re his comments re encouraging Russia to do"whatever the hell they want"?) This is the part (especially when combined with other comments) that in unacceptable and comes across as blackmail. Mobster diplomacy is unacceptable.
This speaks volumes - when regular Russian elements defy a direct order, which is virtually unheard of.Russian commanders resist Putin's orders -- refuse to send troops across Dnipro River
''...Intelligence suggests that around 2,000 assault troops and approximately 300 speedboats have been assembled in the Kherson region. Yet, many high-ranking officers view the proposed attack as a death sentence and are hesitant to deploy their soldiers and resources, according to the ATESH partisan group. They shared on their Telegram channel: "Russian military commanders refuse to send their subordinates to assaults in the Kherson region..."
I think the real risk is that no matter what is done the risk is high that the USA will go increasingly isolationist under the new regime. Besides there are too many Putin apologists/admirers there.We either shift for ourselves on defence then - or do nothing and risk seeing America withdraw interest, commitment and money and like Europe in the 30s, do too little, too late and in an uncoordinated way.
And herein lies the problem if the USA decides to turn its back on NATO which is a distinct possibilitythe world's most powerful military power and lynchpin of NATO.
Tariffs and trade wars hurt everyone. Anyone who believes they can "win" are complete morons.Besides which, the rest of Europe is also going to have to manage his threat of looming tariffs and the inevitable trade war that will bring. Equitable diplomatic and economic relations are not what he's interested in.
I think the real risk is that no matter what is done the risk is high that the USA will go increasingly isolationist under the new regime. Besides there are too many Putin apologists/admirers there.
And herein lies the problem if the USA decides to turn its back on NATO which is a distinct possibility
Tariffs and trade wars hurt everyone. Anyone who believes they can "win" are complete morons.
I somehow think he doesn't give a flying #*£$ about European disapproval. He's a disruptor, he's a brinksman and several far less flattering adjectives. But there he is, elected soon to be leader of the world's most powerful military power and lynchpin of NATO.
Its an observation and a question more than an opinion, but *perhaps* an unwillingness by certain populations to engage, discuss and consider the detail of the global implications of policy formed by these policy makers, lies at the very core of why certain individuals have ended up being given such power in the first place?I get it that the U.S. and it's policy makers have a direct influence on Putin's "special operation" and can be very relevant to this thread, but can we try to avoid personal views about policies and/or policymakers (U.S. or otherwise) because this is where the conversation gets out of control.
Useful idiot...Slovakia's Robert Fico meets Vladimir Putin in surprise Moscow visit
Robert Fico said he and the Russian leader discussed "the possibilities of an early, peaceful end of the war" in Ukraine.www.bbc.com