"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (27 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Didn't the Luftwaffe use concrete bombs when supplies ran short
Those were used for training and were thus common. Never heard it was used in anger.

About the blue cirkel bombs and Tornados.

Those cement bombs remind me of a clever yet very cheap method used by the RAF in 2003 during 'Operation Iraqi Freedom' to take out AA guns, mobile radar units and tanks that were often deliberately positioned by the camel frighteners in suburban streets or hospitals and schools so as to incur innocent Iraqi casualties and the ensuing bad press for the coalition.

To reduce 'collateral damage' a clever bod somewhere came up with the idea of fitting the electronic guidance system that was fitted to 'Dumb' bombs that turned them 'Smart' onto 500lb concrete practice bombs. These were dropped by Tornado's onto the offending targets, thus taking them out without breaking Mrs. Ali's milk bottles on the doorstep next house along. The effect of nearly half a ton of concrete travelling at mach 1 is apparently quite devastating....

The bombs were painted blue to show incoming troops who may find them that they were inert, and consequently they became known as 'Blue Circle' bombs after the British cement company of that name and a parody of the 'Blue Steel' guided nuclear stand off missile of the 1950's.

They were apparently very effective, and compared to the cost of around $40,000 for a single standard JDAM, very cost effective too.

 
A wooden warhead? Reminds me of the Blue Circle ballast, ahem radar in the early Panavia Tornadoes. Didn't the Luftwaffe use concrete bombs when supplies ran short? Concrete bomb - Wikipedia. I suppose even with a wooden warhead there's the kinetic energy of the weapon itself.

From DB:


Ukrainian military personnel recovered the remains of the drone and noted its unusual configuration, which lacked an explosive payload but featured advanced navigation hardware.

The drone was fitted with a newly developed 16-element antenna, according to Serhiy Beskrestnov, a radio technology expert also known as Serhiy Flash. In a technical analysis of the recovered system, Beskrestnov suggested that the antenna was designed to counter Ukrainian electronic warfare systems, which have proven effective in jamming or spoofing satellite navigation signals.

"The most likely explanation is that the warhead was replaced with a wooden block to reduce weight, allowing for extended flight time," Beskrestnov said. "This would enable it to fly across Ukrainian airspace and collect data on how the new antenna performs against electronic countermeasures."


 
Sweden ups the ante.
"Today, Sweden presented its largest military support package to Ukraine to date, valued at almost $1.6 billion."

View: https://x.com/PlJonson/status/1906662712031014954
More than half of the package will go towards procuring new staff. So, maybe we'll see Gripens after all.
And I like him mentioning the "Dragon's Den". If The Bald Eagle can't handle that ugly Bear... The Dragons will do.

Sverige, tack!
 
Sweden ups the ante.
"Today, Sweden presented its largest military support package to Ukraine to date, valued at almost $1.6 billion."

View: https://x.com/PlJonson/status/1906662712031014954
More than half of the package will go towards procuring new staff. So, maybe we'll see Gripens after all.
And I like him mentioning the "Dragon's Den". If The Bald Eagle can't handle that ugly Bear... The Dragons will do.

Sverige, tack!

More reporting:

 
Interesting image from the below video - shows fibre-optic cables from drones:

Image 1-4-2025 at 4.10 am.jpeg



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Fx-KYMyeTQ
 
There are some who believe that the threat to invade Greenland is a "diplomatic" move to destabilise NATO for Putin's benefit. I cannot agree with them but equally I cannot Disagree with them. Greenland is part of Denmark which is a founding NATO state. Article 5 would protect Denmark and Greenland from any Russian invasion but what happens if the US invades? NATO would be fighting NATO and the only winner is Putin. With friends like that who needs enemies.
I am surprised that Denmark hasn't asked to re-open the 1951 U.S.-Denmark Defense Agreement that allows U.S. access and operations on Greenland.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back