"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (21 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Studying the videos posted by the Russian source makes me wonder: where is the proof of the HIMARS launcher destruction? We see videos of HIMARS launching missiles, then some units (HIMARS? self-driven decoys?) moving along the road, then another unit or units (HIMARS? decoys?) hit by drones.
As in many other cases, the number of videos does not verify the claim. (The same can be said about many Ukrainian claims, of course).
 
Not so new, I apologise for the possible duplicate.

Interesting quotes (google-translated):
"According to the paper, the Panzerhaubitze 2000 has "such a high technical vulnerability that its suitability for military use is seriously questioned." The Leopard 1A5 main battle tank, while considered "reliable," is "often used only as makeshift artillery due to its weak armor." The newer Leopard 2A6 is expensive to repair, and field repairs, i.e., repairs at the front, are often not possible.
The IRIS-T air defense system is very effective, but the price of the ammunition is too high and "it is not available in sufficient quantities." The PATRIOT air defense system is also fundamentally an "excellent weapon system," but "unsuitable for combat use because the carrier vehicle is too old and the manufacturer can no longer supply spare parts."
According to the minutes, the military attaché's conclusion sounds somewhat sobering: "Hardly any German large-scale equipment is fully suitable for war.""

"... older German weapons systems are particularly valued in Ukraine—precisely those that the Bundeswehr has decommissioned. The "Gepard" anti-aircraft tank, which is primarily used against Russian drones and cruise missiles, is considered "the most popular, most efficient, and most reliable weapon system," the paper states. Regarding the "Marder" infantry fighting vehicle, the attaché described it as "a very popular combat vehicle without any limitations.""
 
Nobody with a right mind would have used Leopard 1 as frontline tank, at least in my mind I had always seen them as infantry support or makeshift artillery system. The Marder on the other hand seems to be a tad underpowered in this version and overtaxing the engine quicky leads to a overheat.
The comments regarding the patriot carier vehicle seems strange as that should be a common vehicle used by Bundeswehr. I believe PzH 2000 was never designed for constant firing like both sides seem to like in larger operations - it was more intended to be like a sniper and eliminating target with help of guided/smart munitions. With all the tech systems added to western vehicles I expect them to have higher maintenance needs than the rather crude russian tanks.
 
The views of Ukraine deserve to be taken seriously as for obvious reasons no one has used such a breadth of equipment so intensively before.

Its almost as if the designers get carried away with producing the most advanced technical solutions, forgetting that they need to be soldier proof and most of all, reliable.
 
Nobody with a right mind would have used Leopard 1 as frontline tank, at least in my mind I had always seen them as infantry support or makeshift artillery system. The Marder on the other hand seems to be a tad underpowered in this version and overtaxing the engine quicky leads to a overheat.
The comments regarding the patriot carier vehicle seems strange as that should be a common vehicle used by Bundeswehr. I believe PzH 2000 was never designed for constant firing like both sides seem to like in larger operations - it was more intended to be like a sniper and eliminating target with help of guided/smart munitions. With all the tech systems added to western vehicles I expect them to have higher maintenance needs than the rather crude russian tanks.
"You fight with what you have, not what you want."
I'm guessing militaries did not expect war to play out the way this one has. I'm guessing no-one expected a European land war at all.
 
Very good news. New IRIS-T can engage cruise missiles and allow Patriot batteries to focus on the ballistic threat.
April was one of the deadliest months in terms of civilian deaths caused by ballistic missiles:
 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • GTX
Back