"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (131 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

RE:
View attachment 890556

Given this means the US suppliers do not give a #$%^& about how many civilians in Ukraine and the Gulf states die because they refuse to scale production I think Ukraine should disassemble a Patriot and start producing low cost analogs ASAP or sooner.
When do corporations care about anything except profits?
 
The Atlantic is just one of many sites with that story and the US refusal to allow Ukraine to build Patriots is confirmed by official sources.

Even 600 Patriots a year is grossly inadequate given the number used in Iran (over four times that in just four months) so the number available to non US customers will likely be negligible for several years at least.

Freya may be the answer and if so the Patriot will become a US only weapon mainly for cost reasons but also for availability reasons.

Many EU nations will also get Freya when it works as it is built locally thus creating local employment and taxes.

I think the current Freya time line is very optimistic but it will still be available long before the US releases more Patriot missiles to European customers.

Then again Ukraine has a good habit of predicting long and delivering early with notable exception being the Flamingo.
Every site I've seen with that story quotes the Atlantic. Would love to see independent confirmation. As to "refusal to allow," it's early days yet. Stories from actual named DOD(W?) officials suggest they're still looking at it:
"We're evaluating a set of COAs [courses of action] right now, which include a mix of domestic and international sourcing for end units, where they're going to be located, how we're going to build it, [and] which variant," said Michael Cadenazzi, the assistant secretary of defense for industrial policy.

Given that Japan (with a robust aerospace and actual space program) took three years to begin Patriot production after licensing, it doesn't look like a simple process. I'm surprised nobody is talking about just increasing output from the German production line.

And yes, 600 is grossly inadequate, and yet the size of that deal exceeds the entire defense budget of every country in Europe except for Germany and France (and basically ties France's), so the likelihood of it getting much better soon is not great.
 
Maybe so. But the full-scale construction of such a defence has not been attempted yet, except in Israel.
Israel is a tiny county, the population is concentrated in an even smaller area, they had detachments of THAAD and destroyers with SM-3/6 offshore assisting their multi-layer defense, and they still had BMs leaking from relatively modest Iranian salvos. Reports suggest they fired about a year's worth of SM-6 production, and two years' of THAAD.

Ukraine is ~30 times the size defending against missile salvos from an adjacent country with ~15x Iran's defense budget. I'm not sure how the vulnerability math works, but it's fairly obviously not feasible with today's, or even projected, missile interceptor inventories.
 
Use the Phalanx for everything but the ballistic/hypersonic missiles - this would ease the workload of the Patriot batteries.
That would actually be a big backwards step. Ukraine is using a combination of manned aircraft (fighters and others - videos etc of this already posted), SAMs other than Patriot (e.g. NASAMS, IRIS-T SLM, Raven etc), Interceptor drones, SPAAGs, Fixed emplacement guns (the latter two are largely filling the same role as Phalanx would), naming etc. Patriots are pretty much used only for ballistic missiles already. The problem isn't that Patriots are being used to take out something like Shahed/Geran drones. It's that they Russians are using more ballistic missiles and the Patriot stocks have been consumed.
 
Ukraine is ~30 times the size defending against missile salvos from an adjacent country with ~15x Iran's defense budget. I'm not sure how the vulnerability math works, but it's fairly obviously not feasible with today's, or even projected, missile interceptor inventories.
It isn't quite accurate to use land mass as the basis for comparison here since Ukraine isn't trying to defend every square cm of the land mass. It is more on key cities and other important areas.
 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back