Colin1
Senior Master Sergeant
Eric
you can pull this post too if you like, I only responded because I had a little too much free time on my hands
Anti-Aircraft weapons
- Thread starter timmo
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
you can pull this post too if you like, I only responded because I had a little too much free time on my hands
- Thread starter
- #22
timmo
Airman
Yes - 16 August - baled out over sea - drifted onto West Wittering by my Section Leader, Flight Sergeant Berry - savd my life. Killed before I could thank nim.
On a different tack - what did this??
Damn - too big - back later!!
= Tim
On a different tack - what did this??
Damn - too big - back later!!
= Tim
Attachments
Last edited:
Colin1
Senior Master Sergeant
Timmo
more on your exploits please, you sound like you've had a right old life
more on your exploits please, you sound like you've had a right old life
- Thread starter
- #24
timmo
Airman
Like what? I'm afraid of repeating myself.
BofB? Russia? MSFU? India? Christmas Island??
Photos rather than text.
= Tim
BofB? Russia? MSFU? India? Christmas Island??
Photos rather than text.
= Tim
Timmo, both look like Cannon or shrapnel damage. First one looks like a big chunk of something came through the side. Something like the base of a shell. Second one looks like something around 40MM blew up next to the plane and sprayed hits on the fuselage.
- Thread starter
- #26
timmo
Airman
One's the entry - t'other the exit.
= Tim
= Tim
Colin1
Senior Master Sergeant
- Thread starter
- #29
timmo
Airman
Colin1
Senior Master Sergeant
How many tail problems did you encounter personally Tim?
...and how many Sabre problems?
lol everything, so start at the beginning
I'm guessing you're 6' 3" which would have made a Spitfire/Hurricane cockpit pretty cosy. Did you get more room in the Typhoon office?
Erich
the old Sage
as I said earlier there were captured examples used and then reformatted and built up in Germany and yes Norway also took part but it is still unclear as to how many made for the KM as many ships in the KM arsenal have found had 1-2 or up to 10-15 on each craft. example is the 2 Line ships used as Flak ships in 1945 in the Baltic
from another forum and one posters findings
The Germans considered the Bofors gun to be a superior weapon but the 40 mm calibre was odd for them. So the extant guns were sold to Sweden (together with two Bns of 150 mm howitzers).
But what to do with the 82 remaining guns not yet assembled? After thinking a while the Germans did on 1st May 1939 decide to add the 40 mm Bofors gun into their inventory as:
4 cm FlAK 28 (Bofors)
From where they got 28 is unknown. 38 should be more logical.
During the secret build up before "Barbarossa" Germany in Oct-Nov 1940 provided Finland with 92 guns ex-Austrian and ex-Dutch war booty.
By summer 1940 the Germans had laid hand on several factories producing Bofors guns.
1. Austria (Böhler) Sep 1938
2. Poland (Starakowice) Sep 1939
3. Denmark (Söartilleriet) Apr 1940
4. Norway (Kongsberg Våpenfabrikk) Apr 1940
5. Belgium (Fabrique Nationale) May 1940
6. Netherlands (Artillerie Inrichtingen Hembrug) May 1940
The production was however laid down.
The German Navy had captured several ships and craft equipped with Bofors guns and wanted more. Therefore the Kongsberg Våpenfabrikk in Norway took up production as Waffenfabrik Kongsberg. 800 guns were ordered from Kongsberg in Dec 1942. By July 1944 the German Navy had 578 Bofors guns in service. ( this is an uncertain figure according to other German sources )
The extant Beutewaffen Army guns from the factories mentioned above were pressed into the Coast Artillery - some 247 guns.
However also the Luftwaffe became interested in the Bofors guns and bought these from MAVAG in Hungary. By 1st Oct 1942 the German Airforce AA had 240 Bofors guns in service. MAVAG produced some 1.300 Bofors guns during WW 2.
from another forum and one posters findings
The Germans considered the Bofors gun to be a superior weapon but the 40 mm calibre was odd for them. So the extant guns were sold to Sweden (together with two Bns of 150 mm howitzers).
But what to do with the 82 remaining guns not yet assembled? After thinking a while the Germans did on 1st May 1939 decide to add the 40 mm Bofors gun into their inventory as:
4 cm FlAK 28 (Bofors)
From where they got 28 is unknown. 38 should be more logical.
During the secret build up before "Barbarossa" Germany in Oct-Nov 1940 provided Finland with 92 guns ex-Austrian and ex-Dutch war booty.
By summer 1940 the Germans had laid hand on several factories producing Bofors guns.
1. Austria (Böhler) Sep 1938
2. Poland (Starakowice) Sep 1939
3. Denmark (Söartilleriet) Apr 1940
4. Norway (Kongsberg Våpenfabrikk) Apr 1940
5. Belgium (Fabrique Nationale) May 1940
6. Netherlands (Artillerie Inrichtingen Hembrug) May 1940
The production was however laid down.
The German Navy had captured several ships and craft equipped with Bofors guns and wanted more. Therefore the Kongsberg Våpenfabrikk in Norway took up production as Waffenfabrik Kongsberg. 800 guns were ordered from Kongsberg in Dec 1942. By July 1944 the German Navy had 578 Bofors guns in service. ( this is an uncertain figure according to other German sources )
The extant Beutewaffen Army guns from the factories mentioned above were pressed into the Coast Artillery - some 247 guns.
However also the Luftwaffe became interested in the Bofors guns and bought these from MAVAG in Hungary. By 1st Oct 1942 the German Airforce AA had 240 Bofors guns in service. MAVAG produced some 1.300 Bofors guns during WW 2.
delcyros
Tech Sergeant
Typically, british 40mm HE- ammo self detonated 3- to 3500 yards away or alternatively on impact. It´s highly unlikely that a 40mm round would be there in 10000 ft altitude. That´s way outside the effective slant range for this weapon. In 1940 UK FLAK predictors hardly would engage fighters in this altitude. They were able to cope with targets flying straight and level, though.
The 40mm Bofors also had a comparably small bursting charge for a weapon of this size (0.15lbs TNT typically, the 37mm round in comparison had 0.8 lbs bursting charge) little more than one third of the bursting charge of the 20mm mine round with consequently little effects on target by blast effects. It offered kinetic energy on impact but little blast, the latter beeing more important against soft skinned aeroplanes.
The 40mm Bofors also had a comparably small bursting charge for a weapon of this size (0.15lbs TNT typically, the 37mm round in comparison had 0.8 lbs bursting charge) little more than one third of the bursting charge of the 20mm mine round with consequently little effects on target by blast effects. It offered kinetic energy on impact but little blast, the latter beeing more important against soft skinned aeroplanes.
Hello Timmo looks like i've used a picture of Hurricanes from one of your squadrons in my signature picture, i'm guessing that your avatar is your Hurricane ?
might make a good subject for the upcoming BoB group model build.
might make a good subject for the upcoming BoB group model build.
- Thread starter
- #36
timmo
Airman
1. Typhoon belonged to Canadian, Sgt Earl Lavery. Hit over Fécamp.
2. Can't recall - one or two before they took action?
3. 6'3" - right! - but no problem - but not with Irvin Jacket. Seat had good adjustment - very strong spring - tried to alter the position on the approach one day - slipped off the catch I was bounced up down at an alarming rate. Not condusive to a 3-pointer!
4. My a/c? Yes, indeed! I had 9 'O's in my time. Here's a couple.
5. Great info on the Bofors?
= Tim
2. Can't recall - one or two before they took action?
3. 6'3" - right! - but no problem - but not with Irvin Jacket. Seat had good adjustment - very strong spring - tried to alter the position on the approach one day - slipped off the catch I was bounced up down at an alarming rate. Not condusive to a 3-pointer!
4. My a/c? Yes, indeed! I had 9 'O's in my time. Here's a couple.
5. Great info on the Bofors?
= Tim
Attachments
Very cool stuff Timmo. Great info. Think the guys who do Group Builds will be all over the pics and whatnot.
Interesting that your height wasn't a problem in the Hurricane. How about the Spitfire and Typhoon? I had heard the Spitfire was a tight squeeze.
Great tidbit on the Hurricane seat. Spring loaded! Hope nobody saw you do your bouncer, that's the kind of thing that people get nicknames over.
Back to the Typhoon, my understanding is they were used only over France. Did you do ops over France in a Typhoon? If so, when? Were you around during the Normandy Campaign?
Interesting that your height wasn't a problem in the Hurricane. How about the Spitfire and Typhoon? I had heard the Spitfire was a tight squeeze.
Great tidbit on the Hurricane seat. Spring loaded! Hope nobody saw you do your bouncer, that's the kind of thing that people get nicknames over.
Back to the Typhoon, my understanding is they were used only over France. Did you do ops over France in a Typhoon? If so, when? Were you around during the Normandy Campaign?
- Thread starter
- #38
timmo
Airman
Height? No problem in any. Plenty of seat adjustment. But an Irvin Jacket on broad shoulders in the Spit was a bit tight!
How do you mean - only over France?
We shot down the first Me210 over northern WEngland. We did V1 stuff. And, of course, we were often over France.
No - missed Normandy - thank God. Only one of our squadron survived. Went to defend Calcutta instead!!
= Tim
Should I make these smaller??
How do you mean - only over France?
We shot down the first Me210 over northern WEngland. We did V1 stuff. And, of course, we were often over France.
No - missed Normandy - thank God. Only one of our squadron survived. Went to defend Calcutta instead!!
= Tim
Should I make these smaller??
Attachments
many thanks Timmo, will look into doing one of your Hurricanes
Great posts from you log Timmo. Seems you spent a goodly time in the Typhoon 1B. How long was your tour in those fighters? The posts you put up say they were bombing missions. Are they the most common you ever did in the Typhoon or were fighter sweeps as well. Were you bombed up most of the time or did you go out with rockets?
Typhoon had a rep of being a handful to fly, big engine tended to throw a lot of torque. What was it like, in your opinion, versus the MK V Spit? Or MK IX?
Really enjoy the info you are putting out. It is extremely interesting.
Typhoon had a rep of being a handful to fly, big engine tended to throw a lot of torque. What was it like, in your opinion, versus the MK V Spit? Or MK IX?
Really enjoy the info you are putting out. It is extremely interesting.
