Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
the lancaster kicks ass said:but anyway, the lanc, i've been looking at the tiny charts, and can conclude that, with overload fuel tanks in the bomb bay (or in the fusilage as were sometimes carried) she could comfortably manage as 3,200 mile round trip with fuel for an emergency, with a payload between 4,000 and 2,000lbs at 20,000ft (the charts only gave the data for 20,000ft), and that includes the fuel used on the climb...........
the lancaster kicks ass said:and the british used the general figure of 1 gallon of 100 octane weighed 7.2lbs...........
the lancaster kicks ass said:well the manual states that the ground crews should assume the figure 7.2lbs per gallon of 100 octane.........
FLYBOYJ said:Don't know where they came up with that - I know today 6 pounds per gallon is internationally accepted - Imperial Gallon vs a US gallon is my guess?!?
KraziKanuK said:FLYBOYJ said:Don't know where they came up with that - I know today 6 pounds per gallon is internationally accepted - Imperial Gallon vs a US gallon is my guess?!?
1 Imp gal = 1.55l = 1.2 US gal
1 U.S. gallon = 0.833 Imp gal
6lb / .833 = 7.2lb
the lancaster kicks ass said:well where does the conversation go from here
Sure, we could convert miles to Kilometers, Kilograms to pounds, gallons to liters (US Gallons and Imp. Gallons) WHAT FUN!the lancaster kicks ass said:oh great, a conversion site, that'll help the best bomber threat along
the lancaster kicks ass said:well medium bomber's too broad, what about just saying twin engined bomber? cos otherwise where does the mossie go? although in saying that i think we do need some way to separate the strategic bombers (wellingtons, He-111s) from the attack bombers.......
the lancaster kicks ass said:but that's the thing she was sued to some extent as both