Best Bomber of WW2 (continued)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here are a few shots of the Skyraider that comes by Camarillo. I took these at the staging area for QB-34 on June 14, 2004. Busy day on the ramp that day!
 

Attachments

  • 0skyraider5_291.jpg
    46.3 KB · Views: 659
  • 0skyraider4_127.jpg
    41.4 KB · Views: 658
  • 0skyraider3_508.jpg
    45.7 KB · Views: 656
  • 0skyraider2_407.jpg
    50.8 KB · Views: 662
  • 0skyraider_524.jpg
    39.9 KB · Views: 661
Yep - That's Skyraider Bob - great guy! His daughter flies too. Like I said, he has an L-39 and I think he owns a T-28 as well. Hate to see his fuel bill!

Thanks for the photos - great shots!

And let's not forget - a Skyraider can carry as much as a B-17!
 
I have photos of the 2 L-39s that fly out of Camarillo at home somewhere. I will see I can dig them out and scan them in to upload. There are about 12 T-28s down at Camarillo in the old alert hangars. There is at least one more at the EAA area as well.

You're right, his fuel bill must be huge! None of those airplanes are exactly economical on fuel!

The Skyraider was and is one awesome plane. Sounds great when it flies over too!

I probably have seen Bob aroound, just never met him personally. We get so many pilots in and out of the museum, I have a hard time keeping track of them all.
 
At Culdrose airshow last year (which was a distaster) A Skyraider taxied up and down the runway and demonstrated the wings folding. No flying because it was insanely foggy which completely ruined the day...
 
MM, it's a different skyraider over here in england, she's flown by Kennet Aviation, her registration being G-RADR, the easiest way to tell the difference is that ours has "402" on the nose..........
 
FLYBOYJ said:
And let's not forget - a Skyraider can carry as much as a B-17!

Not really. For comparatively short distances it could carry about as much as a B-17 could carry over a much longer distance. For short distances, a B-17 could carry much more than it typically did.

Being a carrier plane, it didn't need the range of a B-17.

=S=

Lunatic
 
evangilder said:
But it carried that much weight with only 1 engine.

Ya but that is one damn big engine! It was about the size of TWO B-17 engines!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread