Best Bomber of WW2 (continued)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Status
Not open for further replies.
cheddar cheese said:
Ah, MP, Now youre making sense! 8) Hey, they could have had it pre-1943 if they wanted. First flew in 1939, introduced into service in 1941 8)

I dont think they could have handled the production with the other projects taht they had and needed more.
 
Woulda, coulda, shoulda, I'm sorry folks, my money sticks with the B-29 all-around, its stats, performance and legacy speaks for its self! besides, it's just beautiful!
 

Attachments

  • b-29_227.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 482
They were so good, the Brits used them in the 50s. (I think they just knew a good thing when they saw it ) SORRY LANC - I JUST HAD TO GET THAT IN!
 

Attachments

  • wash-times4_206.jpg
    21.4 KB · Views: 483
Yeah the B-29 was undoubtedly the best bomber of the war 8) If the P.108 had continued development then I might be inclined to say otherwise...
 
They were so good, the Brits used them in the 50s. (I think they just knew a good thing when they saw it ) SORRY LANC - I JUST HAD TO GET THAT IN!

that is quite alright, and you are correct, we did use about 80 Washingtons (that's what we called them), but we only used them until we got the lincoln into service............
 
I guess when the Ruskies copied the B-29 right down to the rivet, even the rudder pedals (which are a casting) retained the Boeing Logo on them!
 
I thinkl the B29 was probabably the best bomber of WW2 due to technolgical advances, but I think the Lanc was the more successfull due to the length of its operational combat service.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread