Best Bomber of WW2 (continued)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Status
Not open for further replies.

That you are absolutely correct. They had decent designs but they did not start any soon eneogh. They needed to have a good heavy bomber in service in numbers before the war started.
 
I doubt a little bit:
In general spoken, I denie that Germany (1942-1945) had the industrial capabilities to field a heavy bomber force in numbers. It would take too much fuel, training capabilities (with some bad long range fighter sweeps over Germany from late 1943 on..), ressources and precious time to do so. Remember the He-177. Just think of it as a pretty bomber (it wasn´t thanks to unreliable engines), in mid 1944 with most problems fixed, it was introduced in numbers and: It just played sitting duck for most of it´s time. There simply wasn´t enough fuel to fly multiple sorties a month and continue to train rookies for replacing the losses. A strong heavy german bomber force (containing whatever plane) would reduce the numbers of fighters further. And are there enough targets for them? What reasonable target should they bomb? Cities like London? That´s even more a worse choice..
No, I think Germany simply lacked in basics like strategy, escort fighters, fuel and useful bomber tactics for such operations.
Jet bombers on the other hand, even smaller like the Ar-234 B´s or (my favourite...) the few Ar-234 C´s would easily trace to another story.
 
While it is true that you say that jetbombers did not have any significant impact on world war two, it is wrong that they couldn´t have made a bigger impact. Jetbombers allow new tactics, in case of the Ar-234 allowing to ignore air cover over targets and pursuing fighter to a very high degree. It has to be noted that they made really big impressions to air commanders in the closing months of ww2. Thats what we can call future. And the future belongs to jet driven planes...
(Or are you going to denie this?)
8)
 

I generally agree but they had the oppurtunity before the war and that was a mistake.
 

you are forgetting i said jet bombers like the -234 weren't going to have an impact on the war, simply because their payload was too small, they could deliver little more than a fighter bomber and no i'm not trying to deny that jet bombers were the future...........
 
The Dauntlass did a lot for the outcome of the war. It also did a little bit of everything and had a good carrier in the Atlantic as well.

Question on Jet bombers, the speed would be fast for good consistant bomb runs. So I think they would have to slow down into the run and would be caught by fighters or flack.
 
The Dauntless. Without doubt one of the greatest bomber! The problem with this poll is that anyone will define "best" either technically or historically. While I agree that the dauntless played historically an important role, it also suffered in performance figures (compared to late war designs). The best overall agreed solution might be (in my view) the B-29. It has impact as well as performance, deployment in numbers and historical importance.
The Arado jet bomber isn´t that bad. It has a light payload for the B-model (3300 lbs at 410 mp/h) and the four engined C-model could carry medium payload (overloaded) with 5500 lbs at 453 mp/h. Usual approach tactics included a swallow dive at around 500 mp/h. I estimate that the Lotfe bombsight (could) have problems with such a high airspeed, but Askania finished development of a computing bombsight for high speed purposes in february 1945. This bombsight should be used in Hs-132, too. Beside of this, the B-model could disappear at 462 mp/h and the C- model at 560 mp/h in level flight. In case of the C-model it´s even a high speed to intercept for a P-80 or Meteor MK-IV or isn´t it?
The enlarget He-343 was able to carry 6.600 lbs at decent speed (max 565 mp/h without and 488 mp/h with payload) for a decent range (1000 miles) at a decent altitude (max 50.000 ft, usual 35.000 ft), but the design was in prototype stage, only.
The largest jetbomber to fly under prototype conditions of ww2, the Ju-287 (V-1 and V-2 testbed,V-3 and following development under soviet controll) with six BMW-003 should carry 9.900 lbs bombload at 505 mp/h and 1000 miles range and (max) 35.000 ft altitude. Development included more powerful engines as well as more bombload in the Soviet Union.
I regard these designs as the "technically" best. However, they not contributed much (better anything..) to the outcome of ww2. Do you think, this should exclude them here?
 
I've always liked the Ar-234, always thought that Hitler's preoccupation with bombers was not only back-to-front, but so was his strategies...The Ar-234 would've been interesting with heavy, forward-firing armament and RP's...But the dream of jets n' nukes n' rockets were Hitler's plan to overide the creeping destruction Allied bombing was inflicting, and otherwise powerless to strike back except for the faithful Ju-88's, 188's etc., you would think Blitzing England would've woken him then to the fact that bigger bombers were immediately necessary, especially galloping-off into Russia....Britain moved out of twins into the Stirlings first, the US already had the B-17, even Russia had a 4-engined wheel-barrow, but both Japan and Germany found it hard to get their heads around big-bombers, but both had jets.......
It's a shame the US didn't have it's first jet bomber ready in time, but being ordered on 31st March, 1944, it didn't give it much time. Although it had no defensive armament then, it had provision for an 8000 lb bombload, a max take-off weight of 40,100 lbs, a max speed of 503 mph [at sea level], service ceiling of 38,200 ft and a full-up range of 1,100 miles.....Much hope and effort had been concentrated into the B-29's development and deployment, perhaps one could say they weren't really in a rush, they had the aces ready if they needed....Big bombers were the go then, and the higher the better, and now today the B-52 capability is still valid, but Air warfare still went on to the smaller, fast jet bombers...Interesting that aircraft like Skyraiders were still needed, until the Harrier and A-10 filled that gap....By the end of WWII, the B-29 was the best and the biggest.....

I also agree about the Dauntless, as while in Europe they were flying bombers back n' forth, trading bombs, so too in the Pacific, only it was in between islands, and floating-islands; the aircraft-carriers. The Dauntless filled that vital gap, along with the Wildcat, as escort.- Yeah, it kinda takes a unique place in history really, there weren't many other types as effective during those carrier battles, Devastators maybe, but IMHO, the Dauntless had a really good shape and look to it and has always been one of my favourites, even if it wasn't all that fast, they had that rear-gunner........
 

Attachments

  • raf_487__nz__sqn._-_on_the_hunt..._197.jpg
    16 KB · Views: 733
MP-Willow said:
Question on Jet bombers, the speed would be fast for good consistant bomb runs. So I think they would have to slow down into the run and would be caught by fighters or flack.

The Blitz was better suited for low level tactical bombing. I personally think it would have been better used as a ground attack aircraft.
 
Yes, the Arado (as the Heinkel) bomber was kind of a tactical bomber plane. The Ju-287 could be used strategicly if better engines would have been avaiable (Jumo-012 or BMW-018), but as we all know...
Real strategic jet bomber plans were just going to bgin in late 1944. Far away from beeing ready for duties. Most ambitious would have been the Ho-XVIIIb1, the only jet bomber to reach US coast, deliver it´s payload and come back to Germany. However, we can regard these planes rather science fiction than anything else in the possible timeframe.
 

Attachments

  • horten_ho18b-1_03_129.jpg
    29.9 KB · Views: 703
That is not true there were several aircraft that were desined to reach the east coast of the USA. The Ju-390 actually made a test flight and came within site of the east coast of the USA. No more then prototypes were actually built though.
 
It was never close eneogh to actually doing a bombing mission. The aircraft was still in prototype stage and not ready for it. The flight itself is not confirmed. Anyhow over this long of a distance and a 32 hour endurance the 390 would not have been able to carry more 3900lb of bombs which would not make for too much and only a very small nuke if they were able to get one built which would have probably only been a dirty bomb and would have done nothing more then be a terror bombing to scare the US people.

Crew 8
First Flight October 20, 1943
Entered Service 1943
Manufacturer Junkers
Dimensions
Length 34.20 m 112 ft 2 in
Wingspan 50.30 m 165 ft 1 in
Height 6.89 m 22 ft 7 in
Wing area 254 m² 2,733 ft²
Weights
Empty 39,500 kg 86,900 lb
Loaded 53,112 kg 116,846 lb
Maximum takeoff 75,500 kg 166,100 lb
Powerplant
Engines 6x BMW 801E
Power 8,818 kW 11,820 hp
Performance
Maximum speed 505 km/h 314 mph
Range 9,700 km 6,027 miles
Service ceiling 6,000 m 19,680 ft
Rate of climb
Wing loading 209 kg/m² 43 lb/ft²
Power/Mass 0.17 kW/kg 0.10 hp/lb
Avionics

Armament
Guns 2x 20 mm MG 151/20 cannons in dorsal turrets
1 x 20 mm MG 151/20 in tail
2x 13 mm MG 131 machine guns at waist
2x 13 mm MG 131 in gondola



KG200

 

Attachments

  • 3905_119.jpg
    6.6 KB · Views: 651
  • 3904_144.jpg
    16.3 KB · Views: 677
  • 3903_169.jpg
    15.1 KB · Views: 652
  • 390_125.jpg
    24.4 KB · Views: 650

I originally had jet driven planes in mind, Adler. But your Ju-390 info is highly interesting. KG 200 carried out some very interesting missions, too, but little is known about it in general.
Such a strategic bomber only makes sense in case a nuke would have been ready (same goes for the rocketry).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread