The "Big Wing" strategy much promoted by Leigh Mallory,Bader and others as a defensive ploy in 1940 is widely regarded as having been a failiure. Now admittedly it was promoted by 12 Group who were not strictly speaking at the sharp end and not adopted by Park at 11 Group who was but 12 Group would theoretically have had more time to assemble their formations to meet the attackers.
Early in 1944 Luftwaffe units who were very much on the sharp end of the US daytime bomber offensive did officially adopt a similar policy. I Jagdkorps for example reorganised its three Jagddivisionen and kept the various Gruppen of each Geschwader on nearby airfields with the express intention of making it easier to assemble into Gefechtsverbande. They did this right in the middle of the USAAF's "Big Week".
The use of these large formations was deemed successful by the Luftwaffe and the practice was maintained for as long as was practically possible.
Why do you think it worked for the Luftwaffe but not the RAF? Timing? Radar? Command and Control? The sheer size of the american formations?
Cheers
Steve
Early in 1944 Luftwaffe units who were very much on the sharp end of the US daytime bomber offensive did officially adopt a similar policy. I Jagdkorps for example reorganised its three Jagddivisionen and kept the various Gruppen of each Geschwader on nearby airfields with the express intention of making it easier to assemble into Gefechtsverbande. They did this right in the middle of the USAAF's "Big Week".
The use of these large formations was deemed successful by the Luftwaffe and the practice was maintained for as long as was practically possible.
Why do you think it worked for the Luftwaffe but not the RAF? Timing? Radar? Command and Control? The sheer size of the american formations?
Cheers
Steve