Best altitude for the Allison is below 18,000ft, that's not much use over Europe is it?.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Best altitude for the Allison is below 18,000ft, that's not much use over Europe is it?.How so, werent single stage Packard Merlins fitted into P-40s?
Bomber command flew at night because it had no long range fighters.Even when it had Mustangs in quantity, the RAF had no real interest in carrying out long range daylight bomber raids as it had developed its bomber force into a highly effective night time force.
Escort or not the Spitfire needed more range, if they can redesign it to take the 60 series Merlin and later Griffon, turn it into a carrier aircraft, Photo recon plane, and even tow a glider I cannot understand why they couldn't put more fuel into it.I've messed up - the radius needed is 500 miles,, not range; fighters were already with 500 mile range as-is.
That didnt answer my question.Best altitude for the Allison is below 18,000ft, that's not much use over Europe is it?.
So what is your question, do you want single stage Merlins like the 45 series fitted into the P51?.That didnt answer my question.
Nothing needs to be redesigned or changed, long range aux tanks plus drop tanks had been designed fitted and used years before the MkIX entered service in mid '42, the fact that all MkXVI Spits had 66 or 75G rear tanks fitted as standard, the MkIII having a 100G main and the MkVIII having leading edge tanks plus the MkV having all sorts of combinations of internal, drop, slipper and ferry tanks proves the equipment and knowledge was there to make it happen, Portal just needed to be sent to Siberia and have someone with vision run the show.If we're using the Spitfire as the baseline, it's certainly possible to turn it into a long range fighter, but what would need changing? And would these be changes that wouldn't cause significant production delays or require an other production line be opened to prevent/reduce delays?
Well that would be a huge improvement on a Hurricane in 1941 to 42.So what is your question, do you want single stage Merlins like the 45 series fitted into the P51?.
Can't disagree with you there, making Hurricanes up to 1944 was a total waste of resources.Well that would be a huge improvement on a Hurricane in 1941 to 42.
Maybe you missed the start, I proposed Hawkers building the P509 then Mustang MI in UK straight off the drawing board.Can't disagree with you there, making Hurricanes up to 1944 was a total waste of resources.
Is that feasible?, we are talking about an escort fighter being available from mid 1942 with the Spitfire, I don't think Hawker could get the P51 into production earlier than that?, if you want to use Hawker they should be making MkVIII's for escort duties with extra tanks and MkXII's to combat the FW190, leave the interim models to Supermarine and have more of the car companies assembling engines if they can to take the pressure off rolls and fordMaybe you missed the start, I proposed Hawkers building the P509 then Mustang MI in UK straight off the drawing board.
There is more than enough of space to put the external tank under the fuselage, as it was the case historically. Slipper tanks used were droppable, with choice up to 170 imp gals. The Spitfire IX modified in the US have had drop tanks roughly under the cannon installation, so no problems there, too (Spitfire carried bombs sometimes there, plus under fuselage).If (the big word being if) the Spitfire had a P-51 or Spiteful type inward retracting main landing gear ahead of the front wing spar, you'd have some space to put a removable fuel tank, provided that the radiators and their ducting (which are wing mounted) don't get in the way. But since the Spitfire didn't have such an undercarriage, that's basically a no-go. A Merlin powered Spiteful designed with wing tanks would probably be a better starting point. Or a Merlin Spiteful with a ventral radiator (more room in the wings for fuel) or leading edge wing radiators. Or a Merlin (or even Griffon) Spiteful with a modified Spitfire 21-24 wing with inward retracting landing gear attached ahead of the front wing spar.
Probably a political and economic impossibility, but the British were buying planes from NAA from the start, and the P-509 was submitted as a design study in March 1940. My idea was to tell Hawker to "build that" in March 1940, with production gradually taking over from Hurricanes and the spec gradually improving to that of a P-51, not so much as an escort fighter, but as a better fighter, with longer range etc.Is that feasible?, we are talking about an escort fighter being available from mid 1942 with the Spitfire, I don't think Hawker could get the P51 into production earlier than that?, if you want to use Hawker they should be making MkVIII's for escort duties with extra tanks and MkXII's to combat the FW190, leave the interim models to Supermarine and have more of the car companies assembling engines if they can to take the pressure off rolls and ford
Can't disagree with you there, making Hurricanes up to 1944 was a total waste of resources.
Bomber command flew at night because it had no long range fighters.
If we're using the Spitfire as the baseline, it's certainly possible to turn it into a long range fighter, but what would need changing? And would these be changes that wouldn't cause significant production delays or require an other production line be opened to prevent/reduce delays?
If (the big word being if) the Spitfire had a P-51 or Spiteful type inward retracting main landing gear ahead of the front wing spar, you'd have some space to put a removable fuel tank, provided that the radiators and their ducting (which are wing mounted) don't get in the way. But since the Spitfire didn't have such an undercarriage, that's basically a no-go. A Merlin powered Spiteful designed with wing tanks would probably be a better starting point. Or a Merlin Spiteful with a ventral radiator (more room in the wings for fuel) or leading edge wing radiators. Or a Merlin (or even Griffon) Spiteful with a modified Spitfire 21-24 wing with inward retracting landing gear attached ahead of the front wing spar.
However, even that's a problem, because the Spiteful, one, had less wing area than the Spitfire, and two, had less space between the front and rear wing spars than the Spitfire.
To make a Spitfire into an optimized escort fighter or long range pursuit type interceptor that retains all it's admirable attributes., you'd probably be better off using it's design as a starting point, but you'd still end up with a very different aircraft.
Of course, there's also the lightweight Mustangs (XP-51F/G, P-51H/L/M), but you'll be waiting until almost War's end for them in reality. Granted, we're talking about something that didn't really exist until the Merlin Mustangs to begin with, and we're also talking 20/20 hindsight, too.
Then again, the FW Ta-152B/C/H could operate as escort fighters since they had fuel tanks that could be added or subtracted to the wings. But that was too little, too late for Germany (escort fighters were out of place in 1945, for multiple reasons).
My point, formed from what I already knew of World War II aircraft, my imagination, and what others have said here, you can take an existing fighter and make it into what we're talking about, but you'd probably end up with a heavily modified aircraft, or you'd probably be better off with a clean sheet of paper design.
Hurricanes were perfectly suited to 2nd line duties as fighter bombers in the Far East from very austere forward locations.
They fought on out there til VJ Day. Cheap and easy to build, even cheaper and easier to operate.
Possible? Possible, practical? not really.
Despite using the same engine and much the same amount of material, you could build 4 P-51's in the time it took to build a Spitfire.
The Spitfire had zero consideration to mass production with its nearly every panel a hand made compound curve.
They did bomb in daylight, stated on here many times.Even when it had long range fighters, there was no milage in reverting to daylight once they had the technical means to blind bomb with high precision, and night still kept the single engined fighters out of it.