"... Shelby Foote's three-volume "Narrative History of the Civil War"" is what you want too, BombTaxi
. It is comprehensive, covers the western campaign(s) and - above all else - it is highly readable.
Union Generals didn't think Lincoln knew how to conduct a war - so they often dismissed him. Whereas Lincoln KNEW that the North had the economy, the population, and the resources needed to defeat the South if the generals would just stop trying to be "generals".
"... Sherman's March to the Sea is still highly controversial. But the results cannot be argued with." True. But it HAD to be done.
My personal affection often falls with the Southern soldiery - because they soldiered and soldiered on - often marched bare foot - eating green corn from the fields. Amazing leadership from men like Jebb Stuart, Jackson and Forest. And Lee was able to split his army and get away with it - not once but several times. But the CAUSE was doomed.
The most profound conclusion Foote reaches in his trilogy goes like this: -- before the war people would speak in the PLURAL about the US (as in, the United States
are a young, proud nation, [example]). After the war people spoke in the SINGULAR, as in, the United States
is a young, proud nation.
I encourage all who love the United States or who would criticize her to read Shelby Foote.
And Gore Vidal's "
Lincoln" is another very insightful book that really takes a broad view of Lincoln the man, the lawyer, the politician and the President. (I'm NOT a Gore Vidal fan BTW
)
Happy reading.
MM