Curtiss P-36 Hawk , Curtiss Hawk Model 75

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

French notice attachment rack underwing

s-l500.jpg


www.ebay.de

originale Fotografie Jagdflugzeug Curtiss Hawk 75 2. Weltkrieg Frankreich | eBay

Entdecken Sie originale Fotografie Jagdflugzeug Curtiss Hawk 75 2. Weltkrieg Frankreich in der großen Auswahl bei eBay. Kostenlose Lieferung für viele Artikel!
www.ebay.de
 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
It is interesting to me to see that the US was thinking in terms of fighter bombers well before the war.. Of course the Curtiss F11 ultimately yielded the BF2C, a fighter turned into a dive bomber, and it was a US fighter carrying bombs that led to Udet's fascination with the Stuka concept.
 
MIflyer said:
It is interesting to me to see that the US was thinking in terms of fighter bombers well before the war.. Of course the Curtiss F11 ultimately yielded the BF2C, a fighter turned into a dive bomber, and it was a US fighter carrying bombs that led to Udet's fascination with the Stuka concept.
Click to expand...
It's a thinly vailed ad for the export model of the P-36. USAAC P-36s did not have armor, 4 wing guns, the ability to carry under wing cannons , or bomb racks.
 
You know, I think maybe that a Hawk 75 with, say, an R-2600 up front probably would have made a better fighter bomber than anything else the RAF had in the ETO, or on the south side of a P-47. Too bad P-40 production was not switched to that in late 1943.

Screenshot 2023-06-19 at 09-23-21 Curtiss xp-42 front.jpg (WEBP Image 1800 × 1063 pixels) — Sc...png

Screenshot 2023-06-19 at 09-20-43 XP-42_38-4_NACA_short_nose.jpg (JPEG Image 950 × 551 pixels).png
 
MIflyer said:
You know, I think maybe that a Hawk 75 with, say, an R-2600 up front probably would have made a better fighter bomber than anything else the RAF had in the ETO, or on the south side of a P-47. Too bad P-40 production was not switched to that in late 1943.

View attachment 726198

View attachment 726200
Click to expand...
The XP-42, shown above, sure was a nice looking airplane. I like the R-2600 idea, but with a two-stage/two-speed super charger and 4-6 .50's.
It might've bested the P-40, as you aluded to in your post, however, for the XP-42, as it stood, it was a good idea that just didn't pan out.
Wiki explained it pretty good....

XP-42 Wiki Page said:
When the XP-42 first flew in March 1939, it proved to be faster than the P-36. However, the P-40 was faster still and the new nose cowling caused engine cooling problems that proved to be unresolvable, despite at least 12 sets of modifications.
Click to expand...
 
Elvis said:
I like the R-2600 idea, but with a two-stage/two-speed super charger
Click to expand...
You'd have never stuffed all that in a P-40N-type airframe. The XP-42 used an R-1830, so no wonder it was slower than a P-40. I don't think you could have gotten anything bigger than an R-2600 in there without major revisions. I guess a R-2000 could have been fitted to a P-40 without much trouble but that would have not been much if any of an increase in HP. Curtiss tried making a bigger more powerful P-40, the XP-60 and ended up with pretty much a P-47.

Screenshot 2023-06-22 at 08-33-53 Curtiss XP-60 at DuckDuckGo.png
 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

O
Curtiss A-18 with feathered prop
Replies
5
Views
876
fubar57
fubar57
Snautzer01
Curtiss SC-1 Seahawk
Replies
5
Views
1K
Gnomey
Gnomey
M
P-40L
Replies
8
Views
808
MIflyer
M
M
P-38E
Replies
16
Views
977
Gnomey
Gnomey
Spitlead
P-51D "Sweet & Lovely"
Replies
3
Views
635
Gnomey
Gnomey
Back