Did Northrop and Vought Help Design the Zero

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

When I was in high school my girlfriend was made in China. There were significant unique and proprietary qualities versus the western models.
My high School sweetheart was half Japanese and part Hawaiian/Anglo.

I have no issues with the people of any nation/continent.

But the point being, the manufactured consumer goods being streamed from China are not of the highest quality - this literally boils down to "you get what you pay for".
 
My high School sweetheart was half Japanese and part Hawaiian/Anglo.

I have no issues with the people of any nation/continent.

But the point being, the manufactured consumer goods being streamed from China are not of the highest quality - this literally boils down to "you get what you pay for".

I have a 2015 MiC Ibanez AS 93, the quality of which so far surpassed my MiA 2009 Gibson SG that I first relegated the latter to backup before selling it in 2016. The list price on the Ibby was 50% of the Gibby.

25 years ago, sure, Chinese goods deserved the crap reputation across the board. That is not nearly the case nowadays.
 
Last edited:
... aaaaand any excuse to post some guitar porn. SG on the left, Ibanez on the right:

SG.jpg
ibby.jpg
 
Last edited:
Regarding underwing gun pods: Both in the Bf 109 and the Fokker D. XXI such pods gave surprisingly little drag. Less than a 10 km/h reduction in level speed.
 
Some Chinese goods are great. Some are junk. I avoid where possible buying MiC stuff because I want to minimize the support I give to an autocracy that practices imprisonment for thoughtcrime and cultural genocide.
What you're seeing there is a buyer who 'negotiates' a lower price. Chinese manufacturers simply drop the quality to match the price the buyer is willing to pay.
I know a buyer who offered more than they initially quoted - everything extra he got was an improvement in quality. He never had any returns.
 
But the point being, the manufactured consumer goods being streamed from China are not of the highest quality - this literally boils down to "you get what you pay for".
I bought a Realme X2 mobile in October 2019. 12 GB RAM + 256 GB storage space (which is very competitive nowadays), fast charge and top processor (in its day) and till this day zero problems with it. All for some 450 euros (a quarter to a third less than a comparable mobile from other manufacter).

So no like that. Of course there is crap to be found in chinese consumer goods but not everything is that. They are very capable of doing very good things with a good price.
 
Of course, that does apply, irrespective of country...

But on topic, the "fact" that the Zero and other Japanese aircraft "had" to have relied on foreign tech is one of those myths that won't die, like P-51 Mustang designer Ed Schmued being German and worked in the German aero industry (he was Austrian, actually, and was a US citizen years before German rearmament), that the P-51H was "weaker" structurally than earlier versions (not true, except maybe for landing gear), and that the P-40 was total junk (restricted in terms of age of design and high altitude engine performance, but was actually one of the most maneuverable fighters of World War II, just later on didn't have the speed and climb for the most part to go with it).

Yes, Japan did benefit on western technology as far as engine development (even later engines were built using lessons learned from such licensed production), but one, Japan wasn't alone in that, and two, their actual airframes were original designs suited to their requirements of the time. These guys (the designers and engineers) weren't dummies, and only when they ran into engine tech limitations did Japan fall behind markedly. Of course, Germany ended up having the same problems, for many of the same reasons.
 
The Zero designer, Jiro Hiroshi, admitted that he copied the Zero MLG from the Vought V-143.
Admitted to who?
Martin Caidin?

Vought_V-143_3-view.jpg

-XlooPI-eoa8rHc7R9bDnfgYeXbE8LUf3UQjAb0spduLy732Zi.jpg

Aside from being low wing monoplanes with radial engines and inward retracting landing gear it is hard the see where the 'copying' was done.
Zero was about 1 meter longer and had about 1.8 meters more wing span and about 29% more wing area.

Heroshi may have gotten a few ideas/details from the V-143 but something seems to missing from the translation?
 
Don't forget Northrop designs became Douglas. Compare the Northrop/Vought front views with the SBD. Then look at the Fw 190 wide track along with the A6M. Good designers achieve similar results.
 
Admitted to who?
Martin Caidin?

Aside from being low wing monoplanes with radial engines and inward retracting landing gear it is hard the see where the 'copying' was done.
Zero was about 1 meter longer and had about 1.8 meters more wing span and about 29% more wing area.

Heroshi may have gotten a few ideas/details from the V-143 but something seems to missing from the translation?
Is M MIflyer only referring to having copied main landing gear?
I'm assuming MLG refers to main landing gear​
The Zero designer, Jiro Hiroshi, admitted that he copied the Zero MLG from the Vought V-143.​
On the other hand if, it is patented, why wouldn't you copy someone else's great idea?
 
In his autobiography Laurence Wackett also claimed the A6M was a copy of the V-143 and said the Japanese were incapable of designing anything.

Funny thing is Essington Lewis's papers in the Aus Archives used to include a pair of papers that came from the mission that Lewis funded and Wackett and RAAF officers carried out. The papers were sent to the RAAF to be declassified and were "lost". I still have my correspondence with the NAA on this subject but it is in one of probably 50 archive boxes I have not opened in years but will be posted here as soon as I find it (hopefully very soon for other reasons).

I cannot remember the exact titles but they were approximately
  • Japanese aircraft for consideration for Australia
  • Negotiations with Sumitomo Metals for the licenced production of Japanese alloys in Australia.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back