Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
ORS 2nd TAF examined the accuracy of Typhoon bombers on operations between October 1944 and April 1945. Nine 'pin-point' bombing targets were analysed by plotting both bomb distribution from aerial photographs and examination of the targets on the ground. The average radial error for these attacks was 158 yards with only 50% of bombs falling within 130 yards of the target. The chances of actually destroying such a target are consequently rather slim.
Similar results were found in other surveys. For example a survey of seventeen railway line targets, 320 bombs dropped, found the average line error to be 69 yards with only 50% of bombs falling within 50 yards, either side of the target.
Seems that the lower the bomb was released seemed to dictate accuracy the bestAFDU testing Hurricane II - 250 lb bombs:
low level attacks - 50 feet altitude
- average error varied between 16.5 yards and 22.4 yards
- most accurate form of attack - but unsatisfactory against point targets in action due to 11-sec fuses and bomb ricochet
dive attacks - 3,000 feet down to 1,000 feet (1,500 feet release) & 4,000 feet down to 2,000 feet (2,500 feet release)
- average error was 27 yards and 24 yards respectively
- form of attack judged vulnerable to AA fire, 45 degrees found to be the best angle for attack
AFDU testing of Mustang III - 500 lb bombs:
60 degree adive attacks - 8,000 feet down to 2,600 feet (release at 4,700 feet)
- average MPI error of 27 yards
- distance between bomb impact points 5 to 112 yards, average 46 yards
Eight hits on a carrier size target by about 25 Stukas, that's what I would call deadly accurate.
Sounds like the Vengeances were very, very accurate. Though as you say, the AA fire was a way different animal in Burmese jungle than it was in NWE. An anecdote from a Vengeance pilot mentions 800 foot bombing altitude!
Compare that with the 6,000 feet the Typhoons dive-bombed at ... heavily defended targets anyway.
*SNIP*
it doesn't get better than 10 January 1941 for the divebombers
in my opinion, the most accurate divebombing attacks were those that sank the cruisers Cornwall and Dorsetshire. 5th April 1942. Attacks delivered 5th April 1942, in the space of less than 8 minutes by Vals of 1st mob flt. 53 attackers, at least 28 direct hits on the ships, and at least 15 near misses. That's a hit rate in excess of 80%. I don't think that level of accuracy against a high speed target has ever been matched since.
Remember the vengance dived at 90° ...
Ironic that they were more accurate against a moving target than a fixed one.Tests against a stationary target showed an average error of 49 yd (45 m) from a release height of 1,300 ft (400 m) and a dive angle of 70 degrees. Tests against a manoeuvring target showed an average error of 44 yd (40 m) from a drop height of 1,800 ft (550 m) and a dive angle of 60 degrees.
Not necessarily. RAF fighter-bombers/dive-bombers had tactics for a variety of angles. Though in that anecdote he does indicate a very, very steep angle.
Perhaps there was a typo somewhere along the line and he meant the attack was started at 8000 feet.
Skip bombing was highly accurate too but like torpedo bombers was vulnerable to AA fire.