Does Belly Landing in Propeller Plane wreck its Piston Engine?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

I've seen that before. I guess if you're under attack and the engine starts you have no choice, but that is a huge risk
Considering the chaps are firing the pom pom right over your shoulder and Italian bombers are dropping ordinance over head getting that Seafire back in the air is a must. But in reality how quickly can that job be done under fire? They must have been short on Seafires that day.

The pilots probably saying hurry up chaps, and the mechanics are saying, well don't point your prop into the deck next time. With all words forgiven over pints in the wardroom/mechanics mess that night, survivors of the day assumed.
 
Changing the prop or changing an engine? The prop change isn't that long but you may have to make adjustments so you're getting the right pitch settings at a given RPM and manifold pressure.
 
So, a follow-on question: what if you prop-strike on a deadstick landing? I'm assuming the damage will be much less, but there's still going to be gearbox or prop-shaft issues.
 
As long as there's no impact load to the prop you're ok but any type of prop strike, be it static or dynamic and be cause for an engine teardown.
It doesn't necessarily need to cause damage to the prop either. Here's Lycoming's definition:
 
Was at an airshow and this old RAF pilot was talking about delivering Spitfires to Egypt from across Africa. They had just taken off from Khartoum when this Polish W/C came on the radio and said his engine had began running rough after take off. He decided to continue the flight but when he had landed at the destination it was found that ~6" was missing from the prop tops. He had had a ground strike while taking off.
 
It doesn't necessarily need to cause damage to the prop either. Here's Lycoming's definition:
When I was at the academy one of the instructors taxied off the runway and "thought" he taxied over grass. He read that definition and wanted us to do an engine teardown. We told our customer that unless there was an RPM drop, this was un-necessary. After much argument and finger pointing we discovered the grass this guy taxied over was shorter than the prop clearance to the ground! 20-30K of US tax dollars saved!
 
I was a docent at a Hanger for aircraft from WW2 and prior. It wasn't a museum because all of the aircraft flew. Then it got killed by covid, but I digress. We researched all the aircraft and delighted in presenting a previously unknown fact about one of the aircraft to our fellow airplane geeks. (Old men with not much else to do.) What became part of the presentation for our Spit was that it had wooden props so they would break off during a belly landing and save at least some of the engine. Supposedly, the props were milled on lathes purchased from Germany before the war.
Someone mentioned the cost of a rebuild for a Merlin. During a PE on our Spit our A&P mechanic found metal slivers in the oil. We had to fly two mechanics from RR in England to do an inspection and take the engine off of the aircraft and box it up for shipment to California. This took a week; hotel, car rental, etc. on us. Three months later the engine came back and the Brits returned to install the engine. We didn't have a proper jig so the alignment and installation were done with a fork lift. Funny, it was nothing when I watched it happen, just another day at the office. Now that I write about it was pretty amazing. No one ever gave an official final cost, but the rumor mill produced a figure just North of $500 K.
 
Money well spent.
 
I wonder if the FAA preferred that type of composite prop because the tips shattered and had a way of guestimating the engine damage from damage to the prop tip?
Also many RAF planes had CS propellers with Jablo (Heine) reinforced wood/composite blades during the SWW. Maybe especially Spitfires.
 
The Accessory drive gears usually are turning at some multiple of the crankshaft speed, so the impact on them usually is greater.

But on that engine, a C-75, you can usually pull the rear cover and access the accessory drive gears with it still on the airplane.
 
Don't matter - you have to do a teardown inspection per Continental SB and FAA AD. You have to do inspections on the cam and crankshaft and to do those inspections you have to get them out of the crank case!
 

Users who are viewing this thread