Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
New term for me 'mjey' must be short for something, like, 'tight ass', spring for some 3Ds'? Or something like that?For me the seat belts look very flat and a bit mjey. That in comparison with the rest of your work on this one.
Yeah, thats what I was thinking. But 'some' (correctly I must add) would disagree.I'm guessing the seat belts are decals which, although not as realistic as "3D" or fabric or PE belts, should be more than adequate under a closed canopy.
Ahh! It is critique that keeps me driving for better results. And yes, once applied, I did have doubts on leaving them on. To late to order and receive any 3D replacements and the other kit will 'possibly' be used in this same GB?Well it could be that the camera goes to detail that will fade in real life. But just saying. Absolutely no critique.
But since he is in doubt about it i shared my opinion.
Mjeh It means see pic and yes . You should i think be enhancing. The belts stick out as a soiled pantie to the nice cockpit you brewed. There... i said it.New term for me 'mjey' must be short for something, like, 'tight ass', spring for some 3Ds'? Or something like that?
Ouch! Got to think about that one I guess? Just wait. The ProfiPAK version will hopefully redeem my 'error'? Just need to decide to now do it in parallel or series.Mjeh It means see pic and yes . You should i think be enhancing. The belts stick out as a soiled pantie to the nice cockpit you brewed. There... i said it.
Again no critique just politely answer to your question about it.
View attachment 706881
Appreciate noise. It's silence that would be worrisome.Hey!!.. no error just an opinion ( every body has one) and then only because you asked. And it is a compliment. I see your builds progressing in level.
As said i think the cockpit is very nice but if one was to zoom in ( why would one but thats another) i do think a better set of belts would be nice.
I am not building so its just noise from a viewer.
Not if you are married. Then it's called a vacation.Appreciate noise. It's silence that would be worrisome.
Seriously. Not concerned on filling. Just if the gap should be there? The fuselage has definite gaps on top, given the rivet pattern shown, so I assumed this vintage (late WWII) may have started to cut some corners as well?Some of putty and voila.
Certainly makes sense. I would have thought the leading edge would be 'most important' to be aerodynamically smooth.I see.
Contrary to the fuselage there weren't any gaps on the leading edges. The exception is the area with slats. However the gap wasn't like the one for your model but almost at the bottom of the wing. Can you see?
View attachment 708667
th esource: the net.
Wow! Your resources seem endless. I will allow the seams to show, just not re-scribing to make it an obvious one. The wing leading edges are to be as they should, filled.OK. There were seams and the rivet lines on the fuselage top and bottom. However the panel plates there were attached quite tight. Especially these on the top. For the reason it is not noticed and being omitted by designers of moulds and manufacturers quite often. The bottom on the left , the top on the right.
View attachment 708672
the source: the net.