Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Well obviously buffnut453 is looking at the timeline from some angle that is different than mine. Events that occur after 1937 can not impact the previous event that occurred in '37. In no way could the events of '38, '40, or '41 impact the events of '37. That's how time works. The events in '37 could of course impact later events.
The planning and training to attack the US took years starting in the middle of 1937. The IJA rampage in China that started in late '37 forced the buildup as the pro-Axis forces in the IJA knew war with the US was inevitable. Tojo in China doing his dirt to the Chinese in 1937 doesn't mean he could not control the IJA in the mandated area.
Just for the record, the certificate of airworthiness was issued by the US CAA and carried aboard the aircraft. During this period US civil aviation regulation was still in its infancy and there were many rouge operators who ignored CAA rules. Some states even tried to set up their own state aviation agencies.Memos attached to the screening docs tell that, according to the international aviation rules, Japanese authorities should give her flight permission but, to do so, they need to be presented a certificate of air worthiness because there were not a few crash accidents by the record challengers at the time.
Wow, had no idea Kelly Johnson had a crystal ball!I think Kelly Johnson designed the P-38 knowing that several years later it would be used for an aerial assassination.
Wow, had no idea Kelly Johnson had a crystal ball!
No, I think what Buff is saying is that he is pointing out that relations between the U.S. and the Axis powers were still civilized enough even after AE disappeared to suggest that the Japanese murdering AE is ridiculous...patently.
Added to what FBJ said earlier regarding the timeline and where all your major players are and what they are doing also suggests that your theory needs some readjustment.
Well...the part I found particularly interesting, was the "safe on a south sea island" bit.Another 'psychic' that got it wrong
No surprise there then!
Cheers
Steve
Well...the part I found particularly interesting, was the "safe on a south sea island" bit.
.
Ok, let's consider Tom's point for a moment: Earhart was a Yankee spy and needed killing....
Let me be clear- the Orona theory does not paint AE as a spy and the Japanese military did not execute her or mistreat her in any way. The theory speculates that AE spent five years on Roi-Namur under IJN protection and wasn't removed to Saipan until mid '42 after Midway when the influence of the IJN was in decline. The USMC veterans discovered the "quarters outfitted for a woman" and the diary labeled "10 year diary of Amelia Earhart" after the liberation of Roi-Namur.
Very few Japanese defenders survived that battle.
Nor does the Orona theory paint the Japanese people and society as evil. As in Germany, the character of the people remained unchanged. It was the political fascists regimes that controlled and directed the evil without the expressed agreement of the people. So the kidnap and captivity of AE was not something the Japanese did rather it was something fascists pirates did. I thought I was being careful to always use the term pro-Axis pirates on my web pages but it doesn't seem to sink in with most readers.