I have to agree with Hop, either count all the fighters in Europe for both sides or just the fighters available in the south for both sides, anything else is just misleading.
Parisfail wrote : It was the first time that the advantage rested with the defence, and not the the attack in air combat.
If that were the case then the RAF interceptors would outnumbered the escorts on a regular basis and consistantly been deployed at a higher altitude, which was not the case.
If you want to go through the Battle day by day the best resource I have read and own, is a copy of, Francis K Mason`s , Battle Over Britain. The most comprehensive book written about The Battle of Britain. It is meticuosly researched and detailed containing the most complete list of destroyed and damaged aircraft for both sides. It also uses primary sources from both sides.
Slaterat
Parisfail wrote : It was the first time that the advantage rested with the defence, and not the the attack in air combat.
If that were the case then the RAF interceptors would outnumbered the escorts on a regular basis and consistantly been deployed at a higher altitude, which was not the case.
If you want to go through the Battle day by day the best resource I have read and own, is a copy of, Francis K Mason`s , Battle Over Britain. The most comprehensive book written about The Battle of Britain. It is meticuosly researched and detailed containing the most complete list of destroyed and damaged aircraft for both sides. It also uses primary sources from both sides.
Slaterat