Fairey's best aircraft?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


From what I've read, the Bismarck's deck was awash before the decision was made to scuttle. Unless a very well-equipped salvage ship was available, the only heading Bismarck could make would be more-or-less straight down.
 

Well I have not yet had a chance to get these done - work and other four letter words - so here is the basic manual. Most of the large pages to come are from amendment 1 anyway.

Fairey Hendon manual

Well I have not yet had a chance to get the large foldouts done - work and other four letter words - so here is the basic manual. Most of the large pages to come are from amendment 1, Complete and yes figure five is roughly 43cm/27 square in the original. You can print whatever size you want...
ww2aircraft.net
 
Hi Grant.
When you were there - did you notice that SE 5a model (RC?) seen in your first photo above - top right, on the roof..



 
Graeme said:
When you were there - did you notice that SE 5a model (RC?) seen in your first photo above - top right, on the roof..
Click to expand...

No, I didn't, what's the significance of it?

I got quite a few of the Gannett as I had access while I was there to do walkarounds. It's a cool aeroplane. Here's one at Coventry Airport.

MAM 40

The AEW variant leaves a lot to be desired in the looks department...

NAM 51

NAM 52

YAM 10

YAM 11
 
Thumpalumpacus said:
Is it just me, or does the Gannet look like the bastard child of a Brewster Buffalo and a Fairey Firefly with some origami thrown in for good measure?
Click to expand...
Its French cousin isn't any better.



It's a tossup to decide which is uglier. But the Gannet AEW shown below would have been superbly useful at the Falklands had HMS Hermes maintained her arrestor wire capability. With its 50-knot stall speed, the Gannet could have used even an old and almost wornout arrestor kit. Given a longer nose wheel the ski jump on Hermes should have eliminated the need for the cat.

 
Last edited:
There are some nice models at the FAA Museum, including ship models, four generations of HMAS Sydney...

Emden & Sydney 51

Emden & Sydney 52

Emden & Sydney 53

Emden & Sydney 55


The Alize has a beauty all of its own...

Alize

The Falklands war highlighted lots of inadequacies in British armed forces policy, including a lack of close-in weapon systems and airborne early warning. following the conflict, the RN invested in Goalkeeper CIWS for its surface combatants and converted Sea Kings with an airborne search radar on a swivel mount.

Sea King AEW
 
nuuumannn said:
The Falklands war highlighted lots of inadequacies in British armed forces policy, including a lack of close-in weapon systems and airborne early warning.
Click to expand...
If there's one thing British aviation needed for the Falklands it's long range strategic transports like the Short Belfast but with inflight refueling capability. With such a capability once rumours of Argentine plans to invade are realized the RAF could fly in and drop several hundred members of the Parachute Regiment.

Once the Argentines realize they're facing not only a few dozen Royal Marines but also three hundred or more elite Paras they may loose some of their mettle.
 
Admiral Beez said:
Once the Argentines realize they're facing not only a few dozen Royal Marines but also three hundred or more elite Paras they may loose some of their mettle.
Click to expand...

It's kinda hard to quantify either way, as if you look at the numbers of British troops engaging the Argentine forces, especially at Goose Green, the Argies outnumbered the Brits, yet the British beat them in those battles. In hindsight, manpower numbers were not an issue for the British forces, although I'm sure they would have disagreed at the time. They achieved victory with inferior numbers because their training and preparation were superior.

As for equipment, the British armed forces were just not prepared for the battle they planned to fight, and the lengths they went to modify what they had, eg, putting Vulcans back into service - the type was due for retirement and at the time there were no Vulcans with working IFR equipment nor were there any personnel in squadron service who had current IFR training, yet they cobbled together enough Vulcans and crews to produce five serviceable aircraft - were extraordinary. It's worth remembering that the Victor K.2 was Britain's only IFR tanker because at the time the only thing that required it in the RAF were fighters and transports (and Buccaneers). Putting Harrier GR.3s onto the carriers took basic modifications, such as drilling holes in the lower fuselages to enable water to drain out of them and stuffing chaff into air brakes to confuse ground radars because there were no standard launchers fitted to RAF types at the time.

Of course, it's easy to say that if the Brits had the fixed-wing carriers or if they had this that or something else they would'a done better, but they didn't. They went to war with what they had and every war highlights the inadequacy of peacetime military spending - let's not forget the British succeeded in their objectives despite high material losses and equipment shortcomings. Lessons are to be learned of course, but it often takes a war scenario where inadequacies are revealed before changes are made and adopted in the world of the armed forces - politicians hate spending money on the armed forces during peacetime.
 
Last edited:
The lessons learned at the Falklands by the British government was the apparent utility of further reductions, eliminating first the SHAR and then the Invincible class carriers, along with massive reductions in numbers of destroyers and frigates.



The new Queen Elizabeth class carriers partially correct this downward path, but still the above chart that ends in 2011 needs to continue to 2021 to show even more reductions in destroyers and frigates.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

A
Best WW2 Seafire vs. best A6M Zero
Replies
9
Views
1K
Shortround6
S
S
"Generations" of fighter aircraft
Replies
9
Views
245
GTX
Best "general purpose" prop fighter also capable of best high altitude performance
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
PAT303
P
K
Best Aircraft UNDER 1000hp
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
GrauGeist
WW2 Fantasy Aircraft
2
Replies
30
Views
752
tomo pauk
Menu
Log in
Register