Frindly foes over the Falls
- Thread starter pbfoot
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Thank you timshatz, evangilder, Gnomey, Nonskimmer, sorry for the mixed up with my previous posts.
I notice something about my pictures. The copies on paper are just find and
not grainy even if I used 400 ASA 135mm films.
But the scanned images from negatives are giving these grainy images on
the screen.
I am wondering what would happened if I used 100 ASA films instead?
Should I also get images grainy like that once scanned?
I have to try it. But difference between 400 ASA and 100 ASA is 2 stops less
opening the f stops and then restrict depth of field...
Maybe the rull of thumb is what is taken with conventionnal films has to go
on paper, period...
Pierre
I notice something about my pictures. The copies on paper are just find and
not grainy even if I used 400 ASA 135mm films.
But the scanned images from negatives are giving these grainy images on
the screen.
I am wondering what would happened if I used 100 ASA films instead?
Should I also get images grainy like that once scanned?
I have to try it. But difference between 400 ASA and 100 ASA is 2 stops less
opening the f stops and then restrict depth of field...
Maybe the rull of thumb is what is taken with conventionnal films has to go
on paper, period...
Pierre
