Griffon P-51

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

ronjon said:
I saw a fromtal area comparison of the two, and while the Griffon is slightly larger, they're pretty close. I'll post it when I stumble back on it.
Click to expand...
The issue wasn't volume - it was heavier than Merlin and pushed the cg too far forward. Required moving the wing forward, whereas dropping the wing for conversion from Allison to Merlin was not an airframe changing big deal as it did not change the aerodynamic center. Moving wing, wing attach, forward. was a very big deal.

Similar issue with 2S/2S Allison into NA-73/83/91
 
How much did the Commonweath CA-15 have in common with the P-51?
 
In addition to all of the physical problems associated with putting a Griffon into the P-51 there is also the question of where the Griffons come from. According to the Fedden Mission to America Report



It would seem that was an either-or problem. The major user of Packard Merlins was the RAF. In particular the Lancaster program was heavily dependent on the US produced Merlins. A wholesale switch over to Griffons as not a practical proposition.
 
Another question about putting a Griffon in the P-51 is why would you need to? I guess it depends on timeline. As we know, RR considered the idea and built a mock-up, but performance wise, what would it offer by the time it entered service that wasn't already being reached by jets?
 

The US built a facility for the production of the Continental IV-1430, but it ended up building radials for a time, then, eventually, Merlins (presumably started after the IV-1430 was cancelled).

Could this factory have been used to build Griffons?
 
wuzak said:
The US built a facility for the production of the Continental IV-1430, but it ended up building radials for a time, then, eventually, Merlins (presumably started after the IV-1430 was cancelled).

Could this factory have been used to build Griffons?
Click to expand...
That was the Continental Motors, Getty Street Plant, Muskegon, MI. Construction started July 1941. It produced

R-1430 for XP-67 Bat. 23 engines produced Aug 1941-Dec 1942
R-1340 for T-6/SNJ from April 1943 to Nov 1944. 5,100 produced.
V-1650-7 Merlin from Aug 1944 to June 1945. The contract for 8,500 was cancelled in May 1945 after 797 produced.

It can't have been a very big plant given relatively low build cost ($5m) and low production levels.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

J
Ki-84 vs P-51 engagemants 1945
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
CHen10
B
P-51 fuselage fuel tank
11 12 13
Replies
259
Views
16K
Reluctant Poster
R
M
P-61 Performance
Replies
15
Views
1K
Snautzer01
G
Should Napier have been building the Griffon instead of the Sabre?
2 3
Replies
57
Views
5K
MIflyer
M
P-51 6 x .50 ammo increase to 400 rpg complications?
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
drgondog
Menu
Log in
Register