A British fighter pilot lost over Britain could be saved, while if he was lost over the Channel.....There are so many holes in this short sentence I spent some time wondering if it was worth writing an essay.
So instead I invite you to ask yourself this question and let us know what your answer is.
Question - If the War in the Atlantic has been lost, How are the Marines and the vast quantity equipment needed for an invasion, going to get to the Shetland Islands (which is in the Atlantic) in the first place?
I, in fact probably all of us await your response with interest.
Back to that lying word again. Ask yourself another question
Question - Do you really think Rundstedt would have issued the order without Hitler's agreement.
I find your almost total lack of understanding of the very basics of the control and command of Air Combat almost staggering. Bombers cruise at approx 200mph, it varies a bit naturally but that's a fair average. Intercept them say twenty five miles out and within eight minutes your over UK land. Where exactly is the fuel problem for the defenders?
And it was better to shoot a German bomber over Britain than over the Channel:if he was shot over land, he was lost,while if he was shot over water, the Germans could save him .
Other point : why would FC attack the LW before it was over land ? As long it was over the Channel,it was no danger and as long it was over the Channel,it could be a trap for FC.
Radar did not give direction, height, speed, number of aircraft, or even if the aircraft were bombers or fighters .