Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
And I'm trying to say that there are many who served with him and bore witness to his combat record - if there was anything false or extremely erred in his accomplishments those who served with him during the war and in the post war years would of eventually spoke up and possibly stated Hartmann's combat career was skewed, but that never happened. In fact most of the Hartmann "detractors" seem to come from France and Spain.No FLYBOYJ , I don't think so. In fact Hartmann was far away from being a nazi or a hater of all Russian whatsoever.
But in the book there're some facts stated , which are not correct - that's all what I'm trying to tell.
But I 100% agree with your implication, attempting such research is far preferable to just accepting official claim numbers and saying 'oh sure there were overclaims [but who really cares what they were]'.
Joe
If you can find out a likely range for the score, with a clear methodology, and without resorting to a lot of guesswork* and it comes out less than 1/2...then it is what it is. 50% was not low claim accuracy in WWII generally, though maybe Hartmann's was higher, I don't know. Anyway it's not an 'attempt to diminish' but simply finding out what really happened as best we can.Hartmann shot down a hell of a lot of aircraft but to attempt to diminish his score by more than half doesn't seem right, aside from questions raised by skeptics.
If you can find out a likely range for the score, with a clear methodology, and without resorting to a lot of guesswork* and it comes out less than 1/2...then it is what it is. 50% was not low claim accuracy in WWII generally, though maybe Hartmann's was higher, I don't know. Anyway it's not an 'attempt to diminish' but simply finding out what really happened as best we can.
And it's not that the info doesn't exist to at least estimate that real score, it's that people who claim to have done it so far (one guy on various forums claimed to have found around 80 real victories for Hartmann IIRC) lack credibility themselves, IOW they perhaps *are* 'attempting to diminish' rather than doing objective research; and/or their methods are not transparent. But a lot of the necessary info does exist.
* that example I gave of Sutyagin doesn't have a lot of guesswork, it's fairly cut and dried given the methodology and assumptions I stated. It's a much easier case than Hartmann overall, but it also involves Soviet archival info, that part wasn't easy, but not impossible either.
Joe
For the Korean War Soviet records are in many ways more detailed than surviving US ones. On losses in particular there's more US info, true, because there are individual a/c records you can cross check with operational records. I haven't seen that for the Soviets though it may exist. However the Soviet operational records give the basics of how many MiG's lost, and pilot names, in particular combats, apparently pretty complete. It's lack of complete day to day records of Chinese and NK's that pose the problem in verifying US individual scores most of the time after Sept and Nov 1951, when Chinese and NK MiG's, respectively, became highly active.... but in the case of Soviet operations for that period I would guess such records were not accurately kept if they exist at all....
And I'm trying to say that there are many who served with him and bore witness to his combat record - if there was anything false or extremely erred in his accomplishments those who served with him during the war and in the post war years would of eventually spoke up and possibly stated Hartmann's combat career was skewed, but that never happened. In fact most of the Hartmann "detractors" seem to come from France and Spain.Again, I dont see many doing to same to Barkhorn or Rall....
I forgot that was an actual article by Khazanov in the French magazine Fana de l'Aviation; I've also heard of him presenting that on web (I think), ie. said Hartmann's 'real' score was ~80. I haven't read the article. Anyway those are noted historians, Lorant and Ring commenting, but their comments don't IMHO to get to the heart of a proper critique of Khazanov. If as Ring states Khazanov has Hartmann's *claims* wrong in some cases OK that undermines K's general credibility, but in several of those comments he's saying Hartmann's claims exceeded what Khazanov gave for a give day, and he seems to imply Khazanov is not mentioning other German claims, both of which would tend to imply Hartmann's claims were *more* overstated on those days than Khazanov said, according to specific Soviet loss data Khazonov presumably presents in the article (he must I assume, or how could he possibly say specific Hartmann claims didn't check out?). The key issue is how complete, and how fairly analyzed, that Soviet loss data is, and the comments don't address that except with a generalization about 'the disparate and incomplete nature of Soviet archives'. What are some specific examples relevant to Khazonov's article? Hartmann's claims that reached OKL are available online (as well as those of unit-mates), that's not the big mystery.article on my site on this subject, based on a Russian author's article that appeared in a French magazine, commented by French German historians...
This is a very interesting thread.
I am not very keen with Erich Hartmann. As far as i know there doesn' t exists a kill list, but the Abschussmeldungen exists. All what the so called experts know is a fragment of his 1943/1944 kills with arrround 80 or 100 kills listed. Not even the so often mentioned first 150 kills exists as a published list and till now nobody tries to check the Abschussmeldungen as this was done with the nightfighter kills.
I got my hands on the 43/44 list and it looks very strange to me. It seems that Hartmann took off and immediately got enemy contact and then he did not down only a single russian fighter, but 2 or 3 and that in some cases day after day. The russian pilots must be real idiots or as the Nazis said: Untermenschen. I can' t believe that.
I take your general point, Marseille was credited with this, Hartmann with that, but the question here is what happened, not what pilots were credited with. But, "Fighters over the Desert" by Shores and Ring gives the following somewhat different info about Marseille's 17 credits Sept 1 1942 (I cut/paste following summary from somebody else's post on another website, but I have the book and checked the info, it's pgs. 168-170)I think you mean to say that Marseille, claimed 17 kills in one day. DAF records only show the loss of 8 fighters that day. Other Luftwaffe units made claims that day too. Pro rating the days claims gives him less than 8 maybe only 3 or 4.
I think you mean to say that Marseille, claimed 17 kills in one day. DAF records only show the loss of 8 fighters that day. Other Luftwaffe units made claims that day too. Pro rating the days claims gives him less than 8 maybe only 3 or 4.
Slaterat
My main point was that Erich's claims were very close to being accurate. More then accurate as one could possibly expect under trying conditions. .
On other forums we call that necrophillia.Unless you have a good reason that pertains to the thread please dont do it anymore.
Bringing back old threads to say something that has nothing to do with the thread is no good...