Shortround6
Major General
Trouble is that Wiki doesn't really tell you anything.
Modern jets carry so much stuff on the outside that range and radius without notes are worthless.
I have one book (old 1962-63 Jane's) that gives the fuel capacity of a 104G at 896 US gallons (3392liters) internal, there was an option to cram another 122 gallons into tanks in the gun bays (gun, ammo and spent casing storage) and on the outside you could have a pair of 170 liter wing tip tanks AND a pair of 190 gallon underwing tanks.
Now on the 104G you could carry a sidewinder on each wing tip but there go the wing tip fuel tanks.
They claim you could carry a pair of sidewinders on pylons under the fuselage.
They say there are underwing positions for stores, including podded M-61 cannon (no mention of tactical nuke stores) or anything other than ground attack/tactical support missions.
Performance spec says 400 mile "typical tactical radius" but doesn't say using how much fuel, what speed at what altitudes (and jets get very weird about hi-hi-hi or hi-low-hi or low-low low or hi-low-low) and how much stuff is hanging out in the air or even what amount of fuel is used for that radius.
You can burn somewhere around 800 US gallons of fuel per hour at max cruise ratings crossing over between military specs and civilian specs but even that is tricky.
The Military engines and civilian engines often don't use the same terms. Like military used things like normal rating and then 90% normal and 75% normal while the civil engines will max continuous and max cruise. The Military specs give the rpms and the civil engines do not, so........................................
Military engines can use the same rpm for military power and normal even though there is a 300lb difference in thrust. the 90% rating is at just 160 less rpm and the 75% thrust rating is at 6950rpm instead of 7460 rpm.
There are no fuel consumption figures for the military engines.
Unless we can find more modern information it just becomes a giant can of worms.
Mirage III E carries 2600 liters of fuel internal, uses an engine that doesn't quite the same economy as the J-79 and had several external fuel tank options
Performance spec has the humorous listing of 365 mile range at 59,000ft at mach 1.8 (about 19 minutes) but no mention of how it got up that high or what fuel allowance is used to get back down
What I don't know it was the fuel burn is or the thrust at 59,000ft.
I do know that at full afterburn the full load of internal fuel won't last 10 minutes.