Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I think it's too much of a leap to go from Nimrod to Hurricane. We need something in-between that's not a Gladiator. The Vickers Venom looks like a contender.
We keep forgetting the Sea Gladiator was NOT what the FAA wanted, it was what they could get while the Fulmar was in development, and the Fulmar wasn't what the FAA really wanted. What they wanted was the plane that would turn into the Firefly.
Hmmm.... so we need to find another fighter that is in RAF or Commonwealth service in 1937 that is not a Gladiator. What about the Goblin?To be fair to the Sea Gladiator it was an immediately available interim which was still in service as a front line RAF fighter which entered service only in 1937 (they took them to France in 1939) and was still a front line Mediterranean fighter into 1941.
Hmmm.... so we need to find another fighter that is in RAF or Commonwealth service in 1937 that is not a Gladiator. What about the Goblin
S Shortround6 what's your suggestion for a non-Gladiator replacement for the Nimrod? The Nimrod can't soldier on until Fulmar and Sea Hurricane enter service in 1941.
Good points. This makes me wonder what the FAA would have got a fighter had the RN not taken over FAA aircraft specification and procurement. Gladiator? Most certainly, but would its successor still be the Fulmar, or is it Hurricanes and Seafires?I suspect that one problem at this time is about the time when the FAA was being placed under RN control, and the staff expertise was still developing. Could the FAA even ask the right questions to develop a Nimrod replacement? I think the answer is "No!" as shown by the Blackburn Roc.
Returning its aviation arm back to the RN about the time WWII was starting was lousy timing.
I don't share your pessimism. If the interwar FAA had sufficient attention and funding from the Air Ministry to create the Swordfish, Skua and Albacore I see no reason why the Venom or a new type of single seat fighter couldn't be had to enter service in 1937/8.
What aircraft are you proposing to put it in?What about the AS Tiger? I do not know that much about it's history in terms of successful development. Could it have been at least marginally successful if it had gotten more attention? It already had a 2-speed supercharger, what if it had been adapted for 100 octane to the same extent as the Kestrel and early Merlin?
51" diameter x 65" long (the same diameter as the Mercury (51"), but 18" longer. Smaller diameter than the Pegasus (55.3") and only 3" longer)
1300 lbs dry (about 300 lbs heavier than the Mercury, and about 200 lbs heavier than the Pegasus)
So the Tiger VIII would not be capable of significantly higher ratings using 100 octane? I ask because I am not thinking in terms of making it a world beater, just suitable for an interim fighter engine. Also the FAA already had the single-speed Tiger VI in service on the Shark.
Perhaps having the Skua serve as the sole FAA fighter will discourage proponents of twin seat fighters, putting the kibosh to the Fulmar. Nimrod, Skua to Seafire (or Hurricane) works for me. Unlike the folding model is ready, a non-folding Seafire or Hurricane will fit on all the RN's interwar carriers less Hermes and Ark Royal.