Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Martin Middlebrook's book on this raid is excellent, and a must read if you have not done so.
Jim
1.) Wrong bomb selection. Only 20% were 1000pd GP. Minimum bomb load should have been 1000GP with a large mix of 2000GP. Machine tools experienced far less damage from the Incidiary and 500GP than expected. IMO - this error was a major factor all the way through EOW in ETO.
2.) Lack of strength to go back within 5-10 days and repeat. THAT Does lay on Arnld's shoulders - not Eaker, who had been begging for the 600 bomber strength level as committed after POINTBLANK agreed.
4.) Complex plan logically splitting LW forces by launching the two Task forces at the same time, abandoned by the pressure to Go, when weather said No.
Don't know what inventory was, but even 1000# far better than 500GPDid the 8th AF have enough 2,000lb HE bombs available at the time?
Considering bomb drop was salvo vs timed spread, the probability of even fewer hits with much larger bomb implies more serious damage.Was there a fear that fewer large bombs would lead to much fewer hits? The number of hits on factory buildings was 80.
Usual load out for that range was 10x500GP, but Mixes were also frequent.I had thought that the B-17s carried 5 x 1,000lb each. For those carrying 500lb bombs, how many did they have?
Why did Harris ignore the plan if originally agree?I believe the initial plan was for RAF BC to do a follow up raid that night, but they instead raided Peenemünde and the V-weapons development program.
Their likely load would have been 14 x 1,000lb MC bombs each. A few may have carried a different load include a 4,000lb HC bomb. RAF didn't have a 2,000lb MC bomb, only the 1,900lb GP bomb, which had as much explosive as a 500lb MC bomb, maybe less.
Not really, and the lead boxes were long on experience. Lead crew system in effect for 8+ months.Wasn't there a disparity in training between the two task forces?
Worth consideration for a raid within 5 days or so, but the real issue was depletion of B-17s an crews and the absence of 2nd BD still recovering from Ploesti attack. Recall that Ploesti suffered more losses than either 1stBD or 3rdBD on Aug 17.I wonder if having the two targets and two task force also caused problems in organising a a follow-up raid, with the Regensburg group heading to Africa after their raid.
In retrospect, considering the highest priority was Schweinfurt, and that October 14 attack was 'all in', it begs the question 'what were they thinking'?If they had gone all-in on Schweinfurt, that would have been 376 bombers instead of 230. A much harder job for the defenders.
Hard to say. The LW was surprised and unable to mount effective attacks on LeMay's force en route to Africa. I suspect that had the Regensburg force returned to UK, that their losses would have been much higher due to pretty well known return route, and plenty of time to rearm and refuel LW forces. They had nealy 20% as it was.And there may have been more bombers left in good condition that could do a follow-up attack.
Why did Harris ignore the plan if originally agree?
I think it was because of the intelligence they had received about the V-weapons, as well as the reconnaissance photos they had taken.
The V-1 was seen as a very big threat.
Middlebrook's book on Peenemunde is excellent. Yes they were directed to bomb it.Harris was notoriously skeptical of "panacea" targets of any sort. Wasn't he ordered to bomb Peenemunde?
14,000 lbs was the maximum load carried by the standard Lancaster (I.e. Non-special). The load would have been less because of the distance to Schweinfurt, and also Halifaxes carried less. Almost certainly the 4,000 lb cookie would have been part of the load, had they gone to that target.Their likely load would have been 14 x 1,000lb MC bombs each. A few may have carried a different load include a 4,000lb HC bomb.
Phase | Aircraft | Attack | HE | Incendiary | Total | Lb/bomber |
1 | Mosq Path | 5 | 4.5 | 0 | 4.5 | 2016.0 |
1 | Hali II Path | 1 | 2.7 | 0 | 2.7 | 6048.0 |
1 | Hali III Path | 18 | 30.8 | 3.9 | 34.7 | 4318.2 |
1 | Hali III Main | 123 | 0 | 211.6 | 211.6 | 3853.5 |
1 | Lanc Path | 44 | 160.8 | 10.9 | 171.7 | 8741.1 |
1 | Lanc Main | 162 | 366 | 307.2 | 673.2 | 9308.4 |
2 | Mosq Path | 5 | 4.5 | 0 | 4.5 | 2016.0 |
2 | Lanc Path | 40 | 126.8 | 10.2 | 137 | 7672.0 |
2 | Lanc Main | 264 | 529.6 | 492.6 | 1022.2 | 8673.2 |
All | Total | 662 | 1225.7 | 1036.4 | 2262.1 | 7654.2 |
Month | Target | Attack | Short tons | lb/bomber | |
Aug-43 | Kugelfisher | 54 | 113 | 4185.2 | HE/Incend |
Aug-43 | VKF 1 | 78 | 185 | 4743.6 | HE/Incend |
Aug-43 | VKF 2 | 51 | 127.2 | 4988.2 | HE only |
Oct-43 | Kugelfisher | 81 | 165.7 | 4091.4 | HE only |
Oct-43 | VKF 1 | 61 | 137.1 | 4495.1 | HE/Incend |
Oct-43 | VKF 2 | 86 | 180 | 4186.0 | HE/Incend |