Is this the lowest victory claim accuracy ever? (6 Viewers)

I mean to this extent where some pilots have 0% accuracy
Absolutely. My personal favourites include:-

RAF - A sargeant pilot who had a lot of claims in a Hurricane. He was never promoted

IJAAF - A pilot who made so many claims for one combat his fellow pilots basically disowned him

USAAF - A squadron of P47's were about to be bounced by 109's. RAF saw what was going to happen and attacked first. Their thanks was to be attacked by the P47's. The Tempests ran chased by the P47's who continually fired at long range. When they landed not one Tempest had been hit at all and the USAAF unit were allowed 13 kills for the days work. ) I admit that this is my personal best)

Luftwaffe - A unit that had a number of concerns raised over the number of claims some of the pilots claimed.
 
Is this the lowest victory accuracy ever?

(Information comes from the link provided at the top. AI was only used to make the tables look neat and proper with all the information itself coming from the article)
Almost certainly not. I've been reading a lot about the South Pacific, and there are plenty of units (Japanese, but also American) with a frequency of unsubstantiated claims at least approaching this.
 
No it's not a victory.

(Update: Dukovac should be listed with 6 verified victories not 5)

If the plane crash landed or was a write off from combat damage I think you could call that a victory.

If it was just damaged, that's not a victory but it's at least something worth noting.
 
Last edited:
Hate those Victory claims topics, unless there is a specific deinition of victory, it's just ramblings trying to descredit the other "party".
Anyway I'm sure i can find a good contenter for this...

Let's see the Raf FighterCommand numbers on offensive operations in 41. (RAF NUMBERS, from official docs, not something calculated by myself)

PeriodE/A claimed by F.C as destroyedFC Pilots lostGerman Fighters actually destroyed
20/12/1940->31/12/1941775462193

I think it's an interesting topic insofar as it changes perceptions of what actually happened in an air campaign. E.g. your example of British fighter sweeps over France in 1941.

If German fighter strength had actually absorbed the number of losses RAF fighter command thought it inflicted, the allied day bombing campaign would have probably gone a bit smoother than it did.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back