- Thread starter
- #21
Because of the underbelly radiator hindering the installation of an ETC, I thought?On wonders why the LW people will claim that Italian 5 series were not suited for the Jabo role.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Because of the underbelly radiator hindering the installation of an ETC, I thought?On wonders why the LW people will claim that Italian 5 series were not suited for the Jabo role.
Because of the underbelly radiator hindering the installation of an ETC, I thought?
The 109K variant was competitive against those two in ACM to the very end and it was about the Fiats and Reggianes not being better enough, if at all, to displace the Focke Wulf developments.I already gave you the significant advantages - they where wholly better than the Bf 109. They would put up a much better fight against the Griffon Spitfires and P-51D than the 109 was able to, that alone is enough to warrant their consideration at the very least.
Actually thought about that, mind you.Rumor has it that the Italian fighters were also outfitted with wings...![]()
The rearward-positioned cockpit gives them a sleek longnose-look. Usually a good sign wrt fighter aesthetics.I can't really add much to this discussion, but damn, those Italian fighters in this class were good looking aircraft.
View attachment 882698G.55
View attachment 882699C.205