The Antonov An-225 Mriya and Boeing B-47 Stratojet are two other "triple-jet per wing" planes.
It was a while ago, but I believe we were discussing this arrangement...which doesn't include the Mriya or Stratojet.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The Antonov An-225 Mriya and Boeing B-47 Stratojet are two other "triple-jet per wing" planes.
The 3-view drawing contained in this post is from the 1990-1991 issue of the German magazine Aviatik by Uwe W. Jack that is titled Junkers Ju 287 und EF 131.It was a while ago, but I believe we were discussing this arrangement...which doesn't include the Mriya or Stratojet.
View attachment 563587
Drawings of the EF 131's components (from project documents) are available at these links:
Junkers EF 131
Junkers Ju 287, development, projects and prototypes
You'll note that unlike the production Ju 287 and third prototype Ju 287, the EF 131 had six Junkers Jumo 004Bs (of which captured engines were built under license in USSR as the RD-10).
I meant to say that when the Red Army entered Germany and captured several BMW 003s and Jumo 004s, they reverse-engineered those captured engines at Stalin's will and designated them RD-10 and RD-20. It's quite similar to me recently learning that blueprints for the Nazi-era Jumo 022 turboprop were used by the Soviets to build the NK-12 turboprop for the well-known Tu-95 "Bear" bomber.The Soviets continued building the Jumo 004B as the RD-10, but it wasn't under a license from Junkers.
It was taken as war booty, they paid Junkers no royalties .
When you say that the Ju 287 V2 formed the basis of the EF 131, you meant to say that shortly after the nearly complete Ju 287 V2 (code RS+RB) was blown up by the Nazis at Brandis along with the Ju 287 V1 to prevent capture by the approaching Allies, the Americans, upon overrunning Brandis, salvaged the remnants of the second Ju 287 prototype, including the wings, and later handed them over to the Red Army, who used the Ju 287 V2 remnants in construction of the EF 131, given that the original engine arrangement for the Ju 287 V2 (four underwing BMW 003s and two fuselage-mounted Jumo 004s) was changed by Junkers to two three-engine clusters under each wing to save time for test flights. The Ju 287 V3 too had the three engine cluster under each wing, but was to be of all new construction, as was the production Ju 287. As most Ju 287 documentation was destroyed in Allied air raids, Bruno Baade and his ilk had to create a new Ju 287 design from scratch under the EF 131 designation, and consequently, they used the wings of the Ju 287 V2 for building the only EF 131 prototype in tandem with new components (Ju 188/288/388-like fuselage).The Ju 287 V2 was begun in Germany under the guidance of Hans Wocke, which thought up the forward swept configuration for these aircraft and was to have the three engine cluster under each wing, but was not completed before war's end. It was this that became the basis of the EF 131.
Yup spitting image of Vahe Demirjian and reviving old threads as well.A while ago I found this hitherto-overlooked photograph on the Getty Images website of the first Junkers Ju 287 prototype in derelict condition at Brandis after the US Army overran the Luftwaffe base at Brandis and retreating German personnel blew up the forward fuselage of the aircraft to prevent its capture by Allied forces.
View attachment 719006