Kobe Bryant Crash

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

BTW, Husky, is your username by any chance a reflection of a certain Kaman "eggbeater" of a half century ago?
Cheers,
Wes
 

By how your position your question, I gather, already I have at least enough power to operate transitionally between forward flight and hovering flight.

There are plenty of conditions one can operate and move between those aerodynamic transitionals/translationals. I've hovered and slid laterally, climbed, descended and gone through translational lift...then, come out of it again slowing. Or, I've operated somewhat continually in that aerodynamic transition. That is where engine power reserve comes in primarily.

I'm I able to transition to a hovering power requirement at this temp, pressure and weight this moment?

I'll ride transitional/translational flight, sure, depending if taking of or landing. Taking off, I generally wish to get to forward clean air. Landing, I know I'm gunna go through 'dirty' air...it's just how I wish so/need so.

Again, primarily depending upon the environment (pressure altitude and temp), and your weight...one may not be taking the aircraft to the limits at all...or, one could be operating beyond its limits.

Then, there's the whole IGE and OGE hover thingie.
 
Last edited:

thanks for sharing this.

Good old Ansbach, Germany. I was stationed there for 6 years (lived there for 6 additional years as a civilian for 12 years total).

Flew a Blackhawk to the Balkan region several times. Flew from Ansbach, Germany to Linz, Austria, to Hungary, then to Mostert, Bosnia, and then to Kosovo. Flew into Albania a few times while there.

1st trip was a flight of two Blackhawks from Kosovo to Ansbach. Flew from Rammstein to Kosovo on a C-130 to pick up the UH-60's for maintenance. Flew them back in one day.

2nd trip was from Ansback to Kosovo when we deployed. Refuel stop in Linz. Overnight stop in Hungary. Refuel stop in Bosnia.
3rd trip was just the reverse as we re-deployed back home to Ansbach 10 months later.

Flying through the alps in Austria, and along the Croatian coastline was just beautiful though.
 
Last edited:

Why Damn! We may have passed one another. Was there 96-98. Of course, didn't spend much time there.
 
Why Damn! We may have passed one another. Was there 96-98. Of course, didn't spend much time there.

96-98 I was in Stuttgart, and still in High School...lol

My dad was stationed there.

I lived in Stuttgart from 88-98, and in Bad Kreuznach from 80-83. I was in Ansbach from 2000-2012 (2000-2006 on active duty Army).
 
Never. I feel kinda young reliving again. It was a time. Before GPS...still had to relay on ole 'dead reckoning'
You know, the "grey eagles" back in my student days decried our tendency to "slavishly" track the VOR, and declared that pilotage and dead reckoning were dead and we didn't know how to navigate without our "electronic Mama". This despite our own instructors demanding an accurate plot, precise timekeeping, and constant heading and ETA corrections, along with a constantly updated fuel howgozit, and constant traffic scan while working the whizwheel.
Now we old farts decry the youngsters' dependence on electronics to aviate, nevermind navigate, and wonder if they can even handle a basic no-automation airplane anymore. Cycle of the generations.
"There's no such thing as a safe monoplane!"
"How can you fly safely if you can't feel the wind on your face or hear it in the wires?"
"You can never trust landing gear that's designed to fold up!"
"It may be okay for Jimmy Dolittle, but you'll never catch me barging around inside a cloud, no sir!"
"What, no propeller?? Just a blowtorch? Sounds pretty fishy to me!"
Cheers,
Wes
 

Fine, I'm all good with it...if pilots understand how the information comes together to produce the final data.

 
Last edited:
Fine, I'm all good with it...if pilots understand how the information comes together to produce the final data.

View attachment 568762
So, if I typed in the in puter 2000ft and 20 degrees C and a desired true airspeed of 120 kts at an aircraft weight of 18000 lbs; what's my est fuel burn for hour? Max rate of climb speed and fuel burn? And maximum range speed and fuel burn?
 
So, if I typed in the in puter 2000ft and 20 degrees C and a desired true airspeed of 120 kts at an aircraft weight of 18000 lbs; what's my est fuel burn for hour? Max rate of climb speed and fuel burn? And maximum range speed and fuel burn?
Oh boy, a multi variable performance chart! Haven't done one of those in awhile. My professional flying stopped 25 years ago, due to deteriorating vision. And not being a math maven, it isn't the sort of thing I do for fun.
Well, as it looks to me on my tiny cellphone screen, 120 Kt TAS cruise should burn about 840 lb/hr @ 2000'.
Best R/C should happen at 78 TAS, or 72 IAS, at about 740 lb/hr.
Best Range at 134 TAS, 130 IAS, at 1010 lb/hr. In practice, I'd plan on a little fudge factor on these numbers, as operational engines are never as fresh as flight test engines.
The aircraft isn't specified, but I would guess from the fuel flows and speeds it's a pretty efficient rotary wing bird with a pair of 600-700 HP turbines. No fixed wing turboprop would have such a low fuel flow at Vy, nor such a low Vy speed. (Except maybe a Twin Otter or a Dornier 228; and I don't think their best range speeds and fuel flows would fit this profile.) Thanks for the exercise. I needed a good workout.
Cheers,
Wes
 
Last edited:
Nice.
Wasn't that fun? LOL
 
Ultimately, the celebrity has to be the responsible one.
Were the conditions that foggy at take off?
 

Users who are viewing this thread