I am in UK, as I understand it the police there had grounded their helicopters. I didn't mean a celebrity as in a person I meant the celebrity world, I doubt Kobe was looking around for a pilot any more than Diana was looking for a driver. They trust it all to "providers" but frequently when the provider is told a pilot wont fly they just look for one that will, not accept that its too dangerous, because that may cost them their job as a "provider". Ordinary members of the public don't end up in dodgy planes with unqualified pilots on a scheduled flight, wannabe celeb footballers like Emiliano Sala do.
Kobe Bryant Crash
- Thread starter FLYBOYJ
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
- Thread starter
- #122
FLYBOYJ
"THE GREAT GAZOO"
The pilot was ultimately responsible for the safe operation of this flight.
With that said, the weather conditions at take off were actually VFR (1000' overcast, 4 miles visibility). Not the greatest weather but perfectly legal for the helicopter to take off. The fact that the "police grounded their helicopters" was just media sensationalism feeding the uninformed general public.
Freebird
Master Sergeant
Last edited by a moderator:
Freebird
Master Sergeant
The pilot is indeed responsible.
I just hope he wasn't pushed/threatened by management or the client to fly in unsafe conditions to make a timetable
I just hope he wasn't pushed/threatened by management or the client to fly in unsafe conditions to make a timetable
I read in one of the innumerable reports that the pilot was Kobe's chosen pilot and loyal friend. Sometimes a relationship like that, if true, can push a pilot even harder than malevolent management can, especially if both parties are goal oriented go-getter types.
i would bet there are lots of pilots without the correct certification making regular flights to and from the UK using loop holes in the regulation to carry passengers when they are not supposed to.
i believe one guy has been quoted as saying it would only take a famous person to die to shine a light on this sort of thing
- Thread starter
- #127
FLYBOYJ
"THE GREAT GAZOO"
That's something we'll never know. Personally I don't believe that was an issue.
- Thread starter
- #128
FLYBOYJ
"THE GREAT GAZOO"
For what it's worth the NTSB announced today that Bryant's helicopter was making power when it crashed, so much for those witnesses who heard "sputtering."
i Shook my head when I heard the sputtering report. Turbines don't sputter...
Shortround6
Major General
But, But, But witnesses don't lie...............................
They heard the sputter, heard the crash and looked up and saw the impact, we all know that sound travels faster than light
They heard the sputter, heard the crash and looked up and saw the impact, we all know that sound travels faster than light
And normal rotor noise sounds like sputtering.....when recalled from memory after the fact. Especially if there was a sudden last minute pull on the collective before impact.But, But, But witnesses don't lie...............................
They heard the sputter, heard the crash and looked up and saw the impact, we all know that sound travels faster than light
swampyankee
Chief Master Sergeant
- 4,022
- Jun 25, 2013
But, But, But witnesses don't lie...............................
They heard the sputter, heard the crash and looked up and saw the impact, we all know that sound travels faster than light
Eyewitnesses don't need to lie to be unreliable; our eyes aren't video cameras and our brains aren't hard drives. Our brains store interpretations of events with a lot of details interpolated during recall. They even do this while events are in progress.
I don't think it sounds like sputtering at all. It's more like a thwapping.
- Thread starter
- #134
FLYBOYJ
"THE GREAT GAZOO"
Hmmm.... Maybe to someone who's not around helicopters or engines (reciprocating or turbine) very much. Most people don't even know that most helicopters are turbine driven.
An R-22 might sputter because it is powered by a reciprocating engine...
- Thread starter
- #136
FLYBOYJ
"THE GREAT GAZOO"
LOL - it sputters because it could barely get out of it's own way!An R-22 might sputter because it is powered by a reciprocating engine...
You mean like the general public? "Turbine, what's that? I HEARD it sputter! Like a stuttering sound!" Doesn't the S76 have a four or five blade articulated system, not a "thwapper" like the old two blade Bells?
The S-76 still sounds nothing like a sputter. It is very similar to H-60 and more like a buzzing, beating sound. Still more like a thwap than a sputter.
- Thread starter
- #139
FLYBOYJ
"THE GREAT GAZOO"
You know and I know what a sputter and a helicopter sound like (although that sputter clip sounds like a Clerget or Oberursel rotary with a decoupe button being used to provide less than full power by intermittent ignition interruption), but we're around these things all the time. Do you really think the average American, stressed by witnessing a high profile tragedy, would be as sophisticated and accurate in their acoustic memory as you or I would be expected to be?
