Lightweight fighters

Discussion in 'Aviation' started by Chocks away!, Jun 11, 2005.

  1. Chocks away!

    Chocks away! Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    336
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Artist
    Location:
    Cyprus
    Were any of these in action? Here's the moderately famous one
     

    Attached Files:

  2. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    Ambrosini S.A.I 403 was by far the best.
     
  3. Chocks away!

    Chocks away! Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    336
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Artist
    Location:
    Cyprus
    Got a pic? Did they see any action?
     
  4. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    Afraid not :( Ill hunt down some stats on it.
     

    Attached Files:

  5. Chocks away!

    Chocks away! Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    336
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Artist
    Location:
    Cyprus
    Looks like a cute plane :)
     
  6. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    CC what are you baising you're claim this plane was the best on??
     
  7. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    In terms of lightweight fighters, everything...
     
  8. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    At the beginning of the war, the Regia Aeronautica (italian air force) had a lot of obsolete planes,
    most fighters were biplanes. They also had a few monoplane fighter types of excellent maneuverability,
    but their radial powerplants of ca. 1.000PS didn´t allow at least 530km/h. In 1941,
    german DB 601 and later also DB 605 engines arrived and were built under licence for the existing
    monoplane fighters (some guys [that I insulted here in earlier versions] even tried to use a DB 601 with
    a CR.42 biplane), and the results were good, but the speed didn´t reach allied standards. Further, italian fighters
    were mostly too weak armed with only two 12,7mm guns. Because the italian industry wasn´t as fitted for war
    and capable as the ones of its enemies, they tried to solve the problem with a lightweight fighter:
    The Ambrosini S.A.I.207.
    This one followed after the S.A.I.107, which had less than 540 PS, but reached 560km/h.
    The S.A.I.207 were mostly built of nonstrategic materials, had excellent handling and maneuverability.
    Its service ceiling was 12.000m and its armament was typical italian: two 12,7mm Breda MG.
    It reached 625km/h with a a 750PS Isotta-Fraschini Delta RC40 V-engine and 2.000 orders came in.
    They were cancelled after 15, when the advanced S.A.I.403 was in prototype stadium. 3.000 of them were ordered,
    but only the prototype was finished. The S.A.I.403 had improved aerodynamics and armament.
    But the development of these attractive planes ended in october, 1943 due to the armistice with the allies.

    My comment:
    Appearing in great number since spring/summer 1944, they would have been a problem for the allies.
    With intact fuel supply and a anti-bomber-weapon like the later german R4M "Orkan" (Hurricane)
    rocket, they would have blown the allied daylight bomber offensive over italy.
    Imagine: 650km/h with only 750PS! Compare this with the biplanes of the beginning 1930´s,
    which had almost the same power, but less than 400km/h!
    Even the excellent Heinkel He 100 out of 1938 needed 1.1750PS for only 20km/h more!



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifications:
    Ambrosini S.A.I. 403 italian fighter
    Dimensions:
    Wing span: 9,80m
    Length: 8,20m
    Height: 2,90m
    Weights:
    Empty: 1.983kg
    Maximum Take-Off: 2.640kg
    Performance:
    Maximum Speed: 650km/h
    Service Ceiling: 10.000m
    Normal Range: 937km
    Powerplant:
    One 750PS Isotta-Fraschini R.C.21/60 V-Engine
    Armament:
    four 12,7mm Breda-SAFAT MG or each two
    12,7mm Breda-SAFAT MG and 20mm MG151/20 cannon
     
  9. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    speed isn't the most important factor in bomber interceptions however......
     
  10. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    Who said it was restricted to bomber interception...
     
  11. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    no one, but you only talked about it in the bomber interception role, and made it out to be the best thing since sliced brean in that role.......
     
  12. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    Ummmm....Where the hell did I mention Bomber Interception...
     
  13. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
     
  14. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    I didnt write that, thats off the site I got it from! :lol: If I'd typed it, I would have used a capital I for Italy to further push the point of its superiority.
     
  15. Beni

    Beni Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2005
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Occupation:
    Sports teacher
    Location:
    Granada,Spain
    Great Information Cheddar!!!

    But I suposse that a lot of things should have to be changed in the 3040s Italy to develop this production. I think that stopping the daylight bombing of the allies, would be more than difficult...Do You think that this lightweight fighter colud defeat allied fighters at that moment? Even more, in the case that the fighters were able to scort the bombers over Italy....

    Anyway...The plane looks absolutely gorgeous.
     
  16. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    Well the Italians had the Series 5 fighters too - more than enough to cope with allied fighters.
     
  17. the lancaster kicks ass

    the lancaster kicks ass Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,980
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    what about allied fighters that far, far outweighed them in terms of numbers??
     
  18. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    Maybe so, but when the RAF was defending Malta they were far, far out weighed in terms of numbers but they still came though. (But I think thats down to the fact that the Macchi MC.200 and, more so, the Fiat G.50 was pants :rolleyes: )
     
  19. Beni

    Beni Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2005
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Occupation:
    Sports teacher
    Location:
    Granada,Spain
    But I mean not the cuality, that Im sure was enough, I mean the number of planes, the problems of fuel and materials supply , and the fact of the Reggia aeronautica losses against the allies in the mediterranean...I dont know...Is quite dificult to mesure...

    Anyway a new type of plane in the ETO, should have force to a change in the allied tactics ....
     
  20. cheddar cheese

    cheddar cheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    20,349
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    WSM, England
    Oh definatley. If the SAI.403 had made it into service the allied fighters would have had a problem. A highly manoeverable, well armed plane that was also fast as well with a half decent range is a rare thing.
     
Loading...

Share This Page