Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I'm talking about the tactic of simply doing it. U-boats were running rampant up until 1942. IIRC the most successful Coastal Command squadron sunk a total of 8 subs over the duration of the war. Sinking subs was not easy until 1944. And even then easy isn't a word that I would use loosely.
Very true. The funny looking merchant carriers with Swordfish and the like escorted 209 convoys for the loss of nine ships simplyAs I noted earlier, a submerged submarine isn't going to catch a destroyer flotilla. You don't need to sink a U-boat to render it ineffective for the crucial time.
They had figured out the aircraft vs submarine thing in WW I, the number of ships lost in convoys escorted by aircraft was nearly zero even if the aircraft vs sub kills were also about zero.Very true. The funny looking merchant carriers with Swordfish and the like escorted 209 convoys for the loss of nine ships simply
because the planes in the air made the subs dive and lose contact.
"We are waiting for the long-promised invasion. So are the fishes." - Winston ChurchillThe British would have loved the invasion, the RN battle wagon would have sailed right past the 6 or so worthwhile Kriegsmarine surface ships, over the scattered U boats who would be trying to understand what the hell was happening as they tried vainly to cover every approach and plastered the invasion fleet before continuing to the channel ports and blasting them as well before sailing home. The RAF would put every available fighter in the air, the RN every available ship in the channel, German bodies would be washing up on beaches for weeks.
Image being a German soldier bouncing around in an unpowered barge at walking pace, your wet cold seasick and really pissed off then out of the gloom you see the bow of HMS Rodney bearing down on you, you look straight down the barrels of her 16'' guns, stretched out behind her is a freight train of cruisers and destroyers, a few miles away her sister HMS Nelson is leading her own line of ships, everywhere you look you see Royal Navy surface ships steaming down the channel, they will throw everything up to and including the kitchen sink at the invasion force, losses be damned, they are fighting for their very survival."We are waiting for the long-promised invasion. So are the fishes." - Winston Churchill
Is there an option for changing sides ?Image being a German soldier bouncing around in an unpowered barge at walking pace, your wet cold seasick and really pissed off then out of the gloom you see the bow of HMS Rodney bearing down on you, you look straight down the barrels of her 16'' guns, stretched out behind her is a freight train of cruisers and destroyers, a few miles away her sister HMS Nelson is leading her own line of ships, everywhere you look you see Royal Navy surface ships steaming down the channel, they will throw everything up to and including the kitchen sink at the invasion force, losses be damned, they are fighting for their very survival.
You know what the funniest thing is, ask anyone who has experience with boats and experience towing with boats, just getting the whole sorry mess out of port and pointing in the right direction could be classed as a major military achievementIs there an option for changing sides ?
But firm and rugged still, not to mention its high level speed at altitude. Also, I must add that smaller looking canopies seem to do it for me; the canopy of your Ki-43 example looks quite large compared to its body, almost comical.P-47, especially the early marks, looks ugly as hell to me, though it did end up being a good design in the long run. Some of the late models look a bit more 'sporty...
Not slim, or elegant
Snip
Image being a German soldier bouncing around in an unpowered barge at walking pace, your wet cold seasick and really pissed off then out of the gloom you see the bow of HMS Rodney bearing down on you, you look straight down the barrels of her 16'' guns, stretched out behind her is a freight train of cruisers and destroyers, a few miles away her sister HMS Nelson is leading her own line of ships, everywhere you look you see Royal Navy surface ships steaming down the channel, they will throw everything up to and including the kitchen sink at the invasion force, losses be damned, they are fighting for their very survival.
You know what the funniest thing is, ask anyone who has experience with boats and experience towing with boats, just getting the whole sorry mess out of port and pointing in the right direction could be classed as a major military achievement
Late reply, but...
But firm and rugged still, not to mention its high level speed at altitude. Also, I must add that smaller looking canopies seem to do it for me; the canopy of your Ki-43 example looks quite large compared to its body, almost comical.
The Ki-44 and Ki-61 have piqued my interest in the past, the latter in particular, for obvious reasons, but ultimately their performance is par for the course for WWII aircraft, which is why I can't really take the Ki-44 seriously, even if other aircraft such as later model P-47s have slightly similar canopies.
The Ki-84 also, from my perspective, resembles a heavily upgraded Ki-43 in essence, so I'm not particularly interested in it either.
My choices of 'good-looking' Western designs may be contentious, and some might argue frivolous, which I cannot deny outright, but here are some select examples.
View attachment 722681
Quite skinny, but the angular canopy, combined with the exceptional specifications of this aircraft make it a killer in my eyes.
View attachment 722682
Not the best source to find a visual of this aircraft, but, upon coming across this image, something about this one particular image of the P-51C with this angle caught my eye, though revisiting it now, it's a bit underwhelming compared to how i remembered it. Of course, its high performance is also an undeniable factor here, as it typically is with me.
View attachment 722683
Another example of a 'razorback design', so to speak, and relatively prominent nose, which also happened to catch my eye.
View attachment 722684
I kind of take an interest in this particular paintjob, though I guess the "longer noses" may come from the different position of the cockpit and of the wings, but either way, I still prefer this arrangement, at least from the screen.
I am close to giving up on Japanese aircraft; other aspects of their military, such as their submarines, appear to have shown more sophistication anyways.
#90 is indeed "overboosted," it's a postwar racing adaptationWell, that is basically down to personal aesthetics, which one cannot argue with, (or you can, but it's pointless). Here are a couple of nice pics of the 'razorback' Mustang
View attachment 722704
View attachment 722705
View attachment 722706
View attachment 722707
I like this one particularly (325 FG?) because that huge scorch mark / soot streak on the side means they were overboosting that engine.
Those are all beautiful planes you posted, and quite good ones too, though I became less impressed with the Ta -152 once I realized it had basically zero impact on the war.
I think your assessment of the Ki-84 is a bit unfair, and probably based in unfamiliarity, but it would be pointless to try to change your mind. To me it does indeed look a little bit like a souped up Ki-43 but that is by no means a bad thing, very much to the contrary from my point of view.
View attachment 722712
View attachment 722714
I think the only thing wrong with the Ki-84 is that it came out about a year and a half too late. If it had been an aircraft of the winning side, it would be a lot more famous.
And I would also say the N1K1 "violet lightning" compares fairly well to any version of the P-47 actually used significantly in combat. Pretty similar in performance, probably superior in maneuverability and armament. And well protected too.
View attachment 722708
View attachment 722715
As I understand it they were happy at the idea but the early P-47s had lot of small issues typical of a type newly introduced on the other side of the Atlantic. By 1942 the Spitfire, whatever its shortcomings was a well sorted machine on home ground in 1942.I can understand Spitfire pilots dismay upon transitioning to the razor back P-47s. It looks like it should be hauling freight. The P-47N, however, is a killer-cool looking Death From The Sky machine and super cool. I've always liked the appearance of most Japanese planes. I haven't seen all of them yet. The Allison Mustangs are the most beautiful fighters of the Second World War.