MrSmoothie
Airman
- 68
- Jan 21, 2019
I've done a lot of research on ME-163 color schemes, and collected dozens of really well-done color profiles. But as we know, even gorgeous profiles can have errors. Many of these profiles are of the same aircraft, yet have conflicting color schemes.
While it seems pretty safe to assume 76 for undersides, and fuselage/rudder (prior to mottling), what are the latest thoughts on the two dark colors?
This page has much: Me 163B camouflages
It seems 81/83 is a safe bet. But many profiles suggest 74/75 on early examples. The above site makes a good case for 70/71.
Is it all simply conjecture at this point?
For my project, I'm leaning towards a mottled fuselage (Klemm manufactured fuselages we heavily mottled). Would Klemm examples likely been 74/75 or 81/83?
While it seems pretty safe to assume 76 for undersides, and fuselage/rudder (prior to mottling), what are the latest thoughts on the two dark colors?
This page has much: Me 163B camouflages
It seems 81/83 is a safe bet. But many profiles suggest 74/75 on early examples. The above site makes a good case for 70/71.
Is it all simply conjecture at this point?
For my project, I'm leaning towards a mottled fuselage (Klemm manufactured fuselages we heavily mottled). Would Klemm examples likely been 74/75 or 81/83?