Me-262 Gunsight

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Attachments

  • IMG_5114 Trim Acutator removed Three Qtr view.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 36
  • IMG_5115 Trim Acutator removed Front On.JPG
    1.2 MB · Views: 35
It looks like there is a lack of a couple of the pars of the mechanizm.
Yes you could be right. here are some shots with the motor removed. Maybe it is in the same place but they changed access to a side panel because it was quicker or easier to get in there for servicing.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5093 Gap under Tailplane .JPG
    868 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG_5114 Trim Acutator removed Three Qtr view.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 30
  • IMG_5115 Trim Acutator removed Front On.JPG
    1.2 MB · Views: 30
A minor modification could have been introduced. For instance the different trim tab for the rudder. The access pane is quite easy to introduced. Just a matter of different lauout of the fairing between the fuselage and the fin. All depended on the manufacturers then. Especially if the tail main parts were assembled by the different subcontractors. But the motor had to be located in the same place because it didn't slide the stabilizer forward or back but just moved its leading edge up and down.. Judging by the pics posted above the main axis of the screw jack powered by the motor was exactly according to the vertical axis of the plane. May be it would be worth to check if the motor was the same for all of the Me 262.
 
Yes agreed, the motor has to be in the same place to do the same think, its just the way of getting to it.
 
I understood. But as I said the introducing of the port side access panel could be done by the cooperating workshop without any specifications.
 
I understood. But as I said the introducing of the port side access panel could be done by the cooperating workshop without any specifications.
Yes totally agree, the more I look at 500071 the more I think it may have even been a local field modification for quicker access..
 
Exactly. The 50007 was made in 1945 as memo serves. So it might have been almost about the end of the war.
 
#500071 has had panels cut in the airframe to show the interior of the aircraft, the jackscrew panel was cut as well. You'll notice there aren't any nut plates for fasteners on the leading edge of that panel.

 

Attachments

  • Me-262 Munchen - Alt Triim Loc.jpg
    399.5 KB · Views: 28
#500071 has had panels cut in the airframe to show the interior of the aircraft, the jackscrew panel was cut as well. You'll notice there aren't any nut plates for fasteners on the leading edge of that panel.

Ahh thanks MJFUR, that makes sense.
Having watched a video of this aircraft I remember that there are a lot of cut away sections to expose the interior construction etc.
 
I would easily watch a 1 hour TV special in restoring a ME262. Consider filming every step? Sell it to Netflix and find the next project.
 
You collect gunsights? In case you might assist, I have been trying to find an AA spider and cup gun sight for my ZB-37. I want to donate to a museum and have the AA tripod, the arm crook, the belt loader, spare barrel and sleeve. A stunning display except missing the darn sight. Hence I'm throwing out long shots. I can send a photo of the desired sight. At this point I would buy even à reproduction.
Sorry about intruding here.
 

Attachments

  • DA54920D-9F1D-4055-AFFA-A3ACE3C69F94.png
    252.7 KB · Views: 19
I am very sorry Richard, there are people on this group who collect various items of aircraft memorabilia and who maybe able to help you but sadly I am not one of them.
My interest is purely in restoring the Me-262 in our museum to as good a specification as we can (within a limited budget).
Good luck with you search.
 
Hi All,

Just to keep you up to date here is a photo the replica REVI-16B sight being fabricated in the Conservation Centre.

This is one of 2 being made as we decided our Fw-190 would also look a lot better with a Gun-Sight.
R
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7061.JPG
    1.4 MB · Views: 25

Users who are viewing this thread