- Thread starter
-
- #241
Admiral Beez
Major
I have the sense the FAA's expansion and replacement pipeline for carrier aircraft and flight crews was not better than the IJNs.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I have the sense the FAA's expansion and replacement pipeline for carrier aircraft and flight crews was not better than the IJNs.Officially in 1939 Argus wasn't a carrier but an auxiliary.
Under the Washington Treaty Britain had an allocation of 135,000 tons just like the USA. Construction of Ark Royal would have taken us over that limit. So, as Argus, was considered "experimental" under the Treaty she could be replaced at any time regardless of age and to comply with the Treaty she was taken in hand in 1936 for conversion to a "Queen Bee" Carrier. The "Queen Bee" being a target aircraft version of the Tiger Moth (a drone in today's terms) to allow the RN to practice its anti-aircraft gunnery. That conversion took place between 1936 and July 1938. She only served briefly in that role seemingly being in Reserve by mid-1939.
On the outbreak of WW2 she recommissioned for use as a deck landing training carrier thereby freeing up Furious, which had been fulfilling that role based out of Rosyth, to take on an operational role with a scratch air group of a couple of Swordfish squadrons.
Argus was sent to the Med to act as a deck landing training ship for the FAA whose training function had been moved to the South of France to take advantage of better weather.
When you look in detail at her WW2 history, she was only used as an operational carrier when there was no alternative. Most of her time 1940-43 was spent as an aircraft transport to Takoradi, West Africa, Gibraltar/Malta and Northern Russia. After Operation Torch she became a training carrier again, until sufficient escort carriers became available in 1944 to allow her retirement. She ended her WW2 days as an accommodation ship.
When you look at peacetime RN forward planning in mid-1939 for various peace/war scenarios in 1942, neither Argus nor Eagle were included as carriers. And Furious was intended to be in Reserve in the event of peace or a training carrier in the event of war. Hermes, C & G were all seen as fulfilling trade protection roles i.e. keeping the seaplanes free of enemy raiders in the Atlantic and/or Indian Ocean areas, not hunting submarines.
On the outbreak of WW2 only Ark Royal (60), Glorious (48), Hermes, which had only recently come out of Reserve, (9) and Eagle (18) had their full complement of aircraft. Courageous had been refitted during 1939. That coincided with the RN gaining complete control over the FAA in May that year. As a result it was found necessary to convert one of her Swordfish squadrons and her fighter squadron to second line duties on a temporary basis due to aircrew shortages. That left her with only the 2 Swordfish squadrons aboard when she was lost.
Furious received 2 squadrons of Swordfish in Oct 1939 by "stealing" one from Ark Royal and creating another from a training unit.
By March 1939, Illustrious' completion date had slipped a few months but was expected in May 1940, a target that was achieved. Victorious on the other hand was at that point, expected to complete in Sept 1940 but that slipped eventually to May 1941 for reasons I've never fully understood. Formidable was also expected before the end of 1940, something that was achieved. And of course it was then expected that all 6 Armoured carriers would be in service by mid-1942 with more (at least 1 in the 1940 Programme) building.
The outbreak of war in Sept 1939 probably happened at the worst possible time so far as the RN carrier fleet and the FAA was concerned.
The RN had to rely heavily on the USN for training as well as for aircraft.I have the sense the FAA's expansion and replacement pipeline for carrier aircraft and flight crews was not better than the IJNs.
Finding U boats by spotting torpedoes heading for your aircraft carrier is a fools game. There are two versions of how the Ark Royal survived, either by turning end on to the torpedos or by premature detonation of the magnetic explorers. If the latter it was extremely lucky. Trading aircraft carriers for submarines on a one for one basis is not a viable exchange.Hi
Yes, although it resulted in the destruction of U-39 and capture of its crew by the RN destroyers.
Mike
It was nothing like the IJN's position. The IJN was in complete control of its own destiny throughout the 1930s the RN was not.I have the sense the FAA's expansion and replacement pipeline for carrier aircraft and flight crews was not better than the IJNs.
A sad state of affairs. Very informative post.It was nothing like the IJN's position. The IJN was in complete control of its own destiny throughout the 1930s the RN was not.
Just think about it for a moment. Inskip recommended in that control of the FAA be passed back to the RN in July 1937 (the formal announcement was made in Parliament on 30 July 1937). While handover arrangements began immediately, the detail took until the beginning of 1938 to sort out. One of the thorniest details was the question of training both pilots and maintenace personnel. The Prime Minister eventually had to make the decision in Jan 1938 giving responsibility for pilot & technical training to the RAF which already had the infrastructure in place (it was a sensible approach but one that left the RN feeling it did not entirely control its own fate). But the RN had to recruit and select the necessary bodies. At that point ALL the maintenance personnel and about 50% of the pilots were RAF personnel. The RN had to set up an entire personnel organisation to recruit and arrange the training of with the RAF. And this of course was at a time when the RAF had a high demand for suitable candidates for its own massive expansion. The first call for volunteers from within the RN was made in early 1938 as did a call for personnel to transfer from the RAF to the RN. The highest ranking RAF officers to volunteer for transfer were Flight Lieutenants.
How long to train a pilot? 18 months -2 years.
It also needed to look at the expansion plans. It would need aircrew & maintenance personnel for the new carriers coming through (only 6 in number planned in 1939 between May 1940 and mid-1942 = 242 aircraft slots) plus floatplanes and second line requirements. And the Admiralty plan was to form the squadrons for those carriers about 6 months before the carrier completed. So not all those personnel were needed at once.
The final handover was 24 May 1939. No one was expected war in Sept 1939.
Then we come to the problems. 25th May 1939 the Director of Air Personnel in the RN pointed out that back in 1938 the RAF had agreed to loan the RN 100 pilots until the RN could train up its own pilots. BUT the RAF only loaned 50 pilots. SO 45-50 RN pilots had to be sent to fill vacancies in the Observers and Air Gunners training squadrons. That is the explanation for Courageous having 2 of her squadrons converted to training units. At that point it was expected to be July 1940 before these squadrons could be reformed and Sept 1940 before the 50 remaining RAF pilots could begin to be released.
On 4 Sept 1939 the RN had 395 pilots incl the 50 RAF bods (but was still short of 100) and 190 observers (78 short). By 1 March 1940 it expected to have 570 pilots and 375 observers "allowing the expansion required and war wastage" and which would have allowed the RAF to begin getting their pilots back. So looking forward the aircrew position seems healthier than was thought just 4 months previously. As for maintenance personnel "Adequate numbers of on loan from RAF and training now going on will meet expansion". The stores position however was described as "unsatisfactory".
There were also disputes about shore bases that had to be resolved in 1938/39 both at home and abroad in Egypt and Singapore and about the level of aircraft reserves that were required. The RN finally got just 6 airfields from the RAF in May 1939.
Then shortly after the outbreak of war the RAF advised the Admiralty that they will have to provide their own air cover for bases like Scapa Flow. Another unexpected and unplanned for demand for pilots and other personnel. That saw the formation of 804 squadron at Hatston on 30 Nov with but 4 Sea Gladiators initially, taken from the second line deck landing training squadron at Donibristle. As time went on other requirements arose, like helping out RAF Coastal Command in 1940/41 and providing striking forces from Malta and Egypt.
Of course as WW2 went on the rate of expansion for the FAA increased far beyongd that envisaged in 1937-39. From 232 front line and 190 second line aircraft in Sept 1939 it grew to 1,336 front line and 2,790 second line aircraft in 1945. Viewed in those terms it is no wonder that the RN and the RAF needed to take every opportunity that they could to train aircrew. Even so, there were times around 1942 that pilots had to be found temporary billets to keep their skills alive as there were not the carriers and / or aircraft for them to fly from.
Excellent info, thanks. What I meant was that both the IJN and FAA at times struggled to field or replace sufficient aircraft and flight crews.It was nothing like the IJN's position. The IJN was in complete control of its own destiny throughout the 1930s the RN was not.
Right from Pearl Harbor there is evidence of IJN flexibility of decision making on the hoof by flight commanders.With the very strong hierarchy of control the IJN had in place would a flight leader take the initiative and change direction when he had been given orders on where to go?.
The BCATP, based in Canada trained 5296 FAA personnel.:The RN had to rely heavily on the USN for training as well as for aircraft.
True. Poor word choice on my part. Supplement rather than rely heavily.The BCTAP, based in Canada trained 5296 FAA personnel.:
which I suspect was a greater number than those trained in the USA.
Contrast that with Ring's absymal performance, he wasn't even a bit curious what's to the south once he got to the designated target area on 265 and found nothing. Johnson was curious enough so he turned SE on a parallel track to the original KB course, though he missed Nagumo, probably because of him turning NE. Not to mention Waldron getting on his way early on. They all must have had the initial contact report details. If Johnson had more guts he should have joined Waldron early on. Not sure what happens with VF-8 in this scenario.Right from Pearl Harbor there is evidence of IJN flexibility of decision making on the hoof by flight commanders.
When the Japanese torpedo bombers made landfall in Hawaii, Fuchida changed the plan for the approach for his group to PH due to cloud over the mountains between the landfall point and PH itself.
Look at what happened with the sinking of the Hermes in April 1942.
IJN recce aircraft spots her, signals back to fleet but has to return to ship before the strike arrives. 0950 Strike arrives at the point where it was estimated Hermes would be, based on information provided. Hermes was not there. The strike commander then decided to take the force south. They flew south for 40 miles still found nothing. He then took them back north and finally found Hermes with Vampire as escort at 1030, some 40 mins after the initial expected interception time.
Once it was clear Hermes was doomed, the later pilots to bomb switched target to Vampire at 1055. By 1100 others were attacking the tanker British Sergeant.
So it seems very clear that IJN flight leaders were perfectly capable of thinking on their feet and varying their briefed orders as the tactical situation demanded to maximise the effect of their strikes.
With the very strong hierarchy of control the IJN had in place would a flight leader take the initiative and change direction when he had been given orders on where to go?.
Perhaps that was part of the problem. Having all the A6M pilots abandon their high altitude patrols so that everyone could have a go at the low levels Devastators led to there being no A6Ms at high altitude to detect and engage the dozens of approaching Dauntless. Doctrine and discipline aren't there to stifle individual initiative, but to deal with the bigger picture.Of course. Look at Coral Sea and the later carrier battles. Japanese flight leaders had quite a bit of leeway in target selection.
But when the fighters didn't carry radios and the only means of fighter direction by the carriers was to fire their guns in the direction of the attackers, there wasn't a lot of choice other than to leave it to the flight leaders.Perhaps that was part of the problem. Having all the A6M pilots abandon their high altitude patrols so that everyone could have a go at the low levels Devastators led to there being no A6Ms at high altitude to detect and engage the dozens of approaching Dauntless. Doctrine and discipline aren't there to stifle individual initiative, but to deal with the bigger picture.
Perhaps that was part of the problem. Having all the A6M pilots abandon their high altitude patrols so that everyone could have a go at the low levels Devastators led to there being no A6Ms at high altitude to detect and engage the dozens of approaching Dauntless. Doctrine and discipline aren't there to stifle individual initiative, but to deal with the bigger picture.
Imo there is a biased, skewed and incomplete image of the whole issue of Zeros, radios and fighter direction. I'm very interested in the subject but there's frustratingly little info on the subject in this part of the world. From the little i gathered over the years from snippets of info here and there, only (some?) land-based units took the radios off, the carrier based units kept them.
Orders should have been, no matter what you hold your HA station. Leave the torpedo bombers to the LA CAP.But when the fighters didn't carry radios and the only means of fighter direction by the carriers was to fire their guns in the direction of the attackers, there wasn't a lot of choice other than to leave it to the flight leaders.
The IJN had the identical mix of LA torpedo and HA dive bombers strike groups. Indeed, the fatal strike on USS Yorktown was the same, though in reverse with the HA Val DBs arriving before the LA Kate TBs, but nevertheless, coordinated attacks from both low and high altitude were the SOP on both sides. So, back to our A6M drivers, upon spotting the incoming low level Devastator strike the HA CAP should have been asking, hmmm…. now where are the USN dive bombers? We know they're coming. Let's wait for them.With CAP, sure. They had abysmal fighter direction for that task, which presents a bad defensive posture.