Mosquito vs single engine planes.

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


Interesting, the full report would be good to see.

I am noting the conclusions drawn seem to show the Hornet was fast, climbed and accelerated well. Roll and turn rates not as good as contemporary SE fighter , it seems, but no
specifics. So, possibly the Hornet was better at zoom and boom fighting, in reality this can be better than a slower turn and burn machine.
I have read that Hornets could embarrass early jets that ran out of puff at high altitude.

Eng
 
I'd have to research the Hornet. On the face of, the Hornet HAS the speed and armament.
I wonder how a Mosquito or Hornet would do if the Merlins were swapped out for Griffons?

Minus some trials with the Beaufighter, I don't believe the Griffon was ever used in a twin-engine configuration.

 

I'll try and get the other two tactical comparisons up throughout the weekend as I have time.

 
Jet engine are light versus big pistons and the meteor has wide, low-aspect ratio wings. So, it will turn rapidly, but will lose speed rapidly also when it does.

The Hornet should hold speed better than the Meteor in a hard turn. What that means in a practical sense in the real world of aerial combat I'm not exactly sure, but I'm sure we have some jet fighter pilots in here who can make some rather intellgent first-hand observations.
 

Users who are viewing this thread