Most "Bad Ass" looking Aircraft of WW2

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Armament of the US P-47 Thunderbolt attack aircraft close-up. Well visible wings 12,7-mm machine guns "Browning" M2 and guides for three 4.5 inch rockets. I know the rocket accuracy was poor, but i hView attachment 502650 ave to say, this looks pretty menacing.....
I dunno. Looks like he's heading home for a little plumbing project.
 
There is only one way an AT-6 could look badass...

View attachment 502162


Here's another way Dave. :thumbleft:

86811783_209049247165053_8430077897812738048_o.jpg
 
Why bother? We all know Singapore is impregnable. The Japs wouldn't dare attack us there! Those planes are more badly needed in the Med.
With a reasonable quantity of aircraft - IMO Buffalo (60 active in Malaya Command), Hudson (24 active) and Blenheims (47 active) were fine, just quadruple the active numbers of all three to 240 Buffaloes, 280 Hudson/Blenheims), and replace the 24 Vildebeests with my 100 Beaufighters plus better leadership, Malaya (not only Singapore) would have been a tougher nut to crack.

Can you imagine Beaufighters breaking up a bombing raid consisting of egg shell Sallys and Bettys? Compared to the IJAF's fighters in Malaya, the Beaufighter was as fast as the Oscars and much faster than the Nates, and of course much more powerfully armed and protected. The Japanese would have feared the Beaufighter, especially after it tears up the IJN landing ships (that's where the better leadership comes in).

Throw in some MTBs and MTGBs and a few submarines to monitor the Gulf of Thailand and you're a good place. So, yes, get those bad ass Beaufighters to Malaya!
 
Last edited:
I say again, "Why bother, old chap? The planes currently positioned there can easily handle the Japs with their myopic pilots in their wood and fabric biplanes, should they have the unmitigated audacity to attack us there!"

Systemic racism was certainly a problem, especially since the British knew that the IJN was a very competent force. Not extrapolating that to the IJA was a major blunder. The other was that Germany was an existential threat; Japan threatened parts of the Empire. Losing the figurative head was more dangerous than the loss of the extremities that were the Empire.
 
I say again, "Why bother, old chap? The planes currently positioned there can easily handle the Japs with their myopic pilots in their wood and fabric biplanes, should they have the unmitigated audacity to attack us there!"
It's ironic that the Brits respected the useless Italians more than the Japanese, sending their best ANZ forces to North Africa instead of Malaya. Pre-Rommel and Afrika Korp of course, but that's hindsight.
 
It's ironic that the Brits respected the useless Italians more than the Japanese, sending their best ANZ forces to North Africa instead of Malaya. Pre-Rommel and Afrika Korp of course, but that's hindsight.
"Why deny a needed use of troops in favor of a nonexistent threat? Those yellow monkeys wouldn't DARE attack any part of our empire, no matter how much they rattle their sabers!"
 
"Why deny a needed use of troops in favor of a nonexistent threat? Those yellow monkeys wouldn't DARE attack any part of our empire, no matter how much they rattle their sabers!"
I sense we won't close this turn of thought until someone agrees with you. So, I volunteer.

I agree with everything you've written above.
 
This plan not only assumes good leadership, it requires thousands of ground crewmen (and their logistics tail) who are trained in addition to the hundreds of airmen (and their logistics) who need to be better trained than the Pilots/crew who were there.

Hardware may be the easy part?
 
Since I haven't seen it here yet and this is based on looks I'll nominate the Panzerknacker. To me the Henschel HS 129 was one of the most sinister looking aircraft of the war, with or without the Pak 40 variant 75 mm anti tank mounted. I think that's a 37mm mounted below. An A-10 of it's day, with a reptilian snout.
65AFD0C1-3943-4A26-8BE6-07E7151BD512.jpeg
29F10BB3-816C-4E09-B7A1-0EB0DCA3CE92.jpeg
 
To me the Henschel HS 129 was one of the most sinister looking aircraft of the war,
Agreed. Now, put some (admittedly non-existent from LW perspective) better and yet still compact engines on the Henschel and you've got bad ass performance to match the looks.

Interestingly, when searching Google there are very few images of the HS 129 either in-flight or carrying bombs. There are some, but the vast majority are images on the ground without bombs or bomb racks. Perhaps the ground-based photographers shared our opinion that the HS 129 was a sinister looking bird.

Did anyone make a small radial that we could swap out for the twin 660 hp, 37 in. diameter Gnome-Rhone 14M? If only as a postwar experiment.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back