GregP
Major
Hey Spicemart,
Unless I remember incorrectly, the YF-23 met the specifications and the YF-22 didn't. When the YF-22 didn't, they lowered the spec so it could compete. That's a GREAT indication that the "fix" is in, isn't it? Once they lowered the spec for stealth, I knew the YF-23 was doomed. There was NO reason to lower the spec otherwise. Had Northrop-Grumman been given the chance to "de-stealth" their entry and then resubmit (for possibly better airframe performance and easier maintainability), I'd have been optimistic about a more fair outcome. When that didn't happen, I knew the contest was over.
Unless I remember incorrectly, the YF-23 met the specifications and the YF-22 didn't. When the YF-22 didn't, they lowered the spec so it could compete. That's a GREAT indication that the "fix" is in, isn't it? Once they lowered the spec for stealth, I knew the YF-23 was doomed. There was NO reason to lower the spec otherwise. Had Northrop-Grumman been given the chance to "de-stealth" their entry and then resubmit (for possibly better airframe performance and easier maintainability), I'd have been optimistic about a more fair outcome. When that didn't happen, I knew the contest was over.