P-39 D Aircobra vs. Me-109

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


I would be very suprised if this was the case seeing as the only Migs the IAF had were Mig21's.
 
In 1956 timeframe? Not very likely but I will go check I may have the dates wrong

I stand corrected Glider it was in the 70's after VietNam for him and the IAF were flying MiG-21s, Pakistani AF flying 86's..I thought he had shot down MiG-15s but they were MiG-21J's apparently.

The Pakistani Air Force was flyin 86's, Chinese built MiG 19's and F-104's.

Yeager, according to the back channel, was flying flight lead in an F-86 wing when bounced by IAF MiG's which chose to fight in the horizontal.
 
I stand corrected Glider it was in the 70's after VietNam for him and the IAF were flying MiG-21s, Pakistani AF flying 86's..

I read a few articles from Pakistan about a few MiG-21 vs Saber dogfights. Short on details but it was stated the MiG-21s were dealt with accordingly.
 

Hehe, the slats only extend when the AoA increases, so this is probably what Rall was refering to. Rall is often qouted on the slats by certain people, but he hardly understood them, his comments being disputed by the other 109 pilots. Modern day 109 pilots have questioned his remarks about the slats many times, knowing the slats operate flawlessly on the currently restored F G models, and thus are curious as to what made the Emil so different (Rall refers to the Emil about the G-load deployment issue). However fact is that Rall's near death experience in the Emil made him very wary about the slats, and so he never tried turning that hard in a 109 again, but he didn't need to either having perfected his own B&Z tactics as a result of this incident in the Emil.

Rall in the end downed 275 Allied a/c utilizing his own B&Z tactics, very effective.
 
And Dave - discussing Buzz Wagner - I think he was a notch above his peers, if not more....

That was exactly my point. Soren had said " Marseilles wasn't very impressed with their turn performance though, esp. seeig thats how he shot them down..". My point was that Marseilles was also a notch above his peers and that comments by such talented pilots on aircraft performance can be tainted by their own exceptional capability, i.e. they can make lesser performing aircraft successful, therefore they think the plane is better than it actually is.
 
go p-39 flown by russins man that sweet cus i herd the p-39 sucked with americans so this a surpies
 
well the p-39 was use less to the u.s so when i learned the russins had a better deal with it i was surpiesed
 
He's obviously a kid, which is all fine, this is a good place to learn. Whether he learns the correct form of spellings here or in school is irrelevant, as long as it's correct
 

Users who are viewing this thread