P-47D or F4U-1?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

The P-47D with the paddle blade can reach 20,000ft in 7 minutes. The F4U-1reaches 20,000ft in 7.5 minutes.

I found this surprising. With slightly better climb, speed and clearly superior roll, dive and firepower, as long as the P-47 stays out of a tight turning fight, it looks like it could come out on top.
 
Does the Thunderbolt have a better roll rate than the Corsair? I didn't know that.

I too was surprised at that climb rate data. The paddle blade transformed the Jug into a competent air to air ship.

I agree though that in a turning fight (especially at low altitude), the Corsair would probably wax it.

I think the advantages the Jug has would probably grow with the increase in altitude where its turbosupercharger could really pour on the horsepower.
 
Climb at S/L - 3,100fpm (Corsair) 3,200fpm (Thunderbolt)

Climb at 10,000ft. - 2,975fpm (Corsair) 3,050fpm (Thunderbolt)

Climb at 15,000ft. - 2,700fpm (Corsair) 2,900fpm (Thunderbolt)

Climb at 20,000ft. - 2,250fpm (Corsair) 2,650fpm (Thunderbolt)

Max Speed at S/L - 353mph (Corsair) 340 mph (Thunderbolt)

Max Speed at 20,000ft. - 405mph (Corsair) 415 mph (Thunderbolt)
 

Most sources post a top speed for the F4U-1 at 417mph - 420mph.

Vought actualy reduced the roll rate on the Corsair because the prototype rolled to quickly and easily.

wmaxt
 
Wmaxt, the chart for the F4U-1 shows exactly that. At 25,000ft, the top speed is 420mph. At 20,000ft, the top speed is 405mph.
 
Here's a factor to consider in ALL of these comparos. An aircraft engine is set up by the factory to produce best speeds at certain altitudes relative to boost, supercharger, turbo settings and carburation due to air density, temperature and grains of water per cubic foot of ingested air.

Remember crew chiefs hotrodded Mustangs, Tempests and others to pull max power levels below 10,000 feet for V-1 intercepts. When we compare speed levels at altitudes we must realize that to 2 planes at the same altitude will have different performance even if they both have the same top speeds at their respective best performing altitudes.

If a plane goes 410 MPH at 27,000 feet and another makes 410 at 19,500 feet if they meet at either specified level one will lack power and speed. If they mix it up at an arbitrary altitude both will have lesser top ends.
 
Twitch, you are correct, of course, which is why I provided data points for the same altitudes for both aircraft.

The 2,535 hp paddle blade and water injection "D" model was a different animal indeed. Who would have thought that it could match/out perform an F4U-1 in climb rate?
 
wmaxt said:
Most sources post a top speed for the F4U-1 at 417mph - 420mph.

Vought actualy reduced the roll rate on the Corsair because the prototype rolled to quickly and easily.

wmaxt
Click to expand...

The critical altitude (max altitude in which the engine produces max power) is most likely higher than 20,000 feet for the Corsair and certainly higher for the Thunderbolt. The higher the engine makes max power, the faster the airframe will go because the drag gets less the higher it goes.
Chris...
 
The F4U-1 can pull 2,000hp as high as 19,000ft. After that it begins to steadily drop off. At 25,000ft, it's pulling 1,500hp.

The chart on the P-47 doesn't indicate the H.P. curve but I recall from memory that the P-47D could pull 100% at close to 30,000ft.
 
P-47 roll rates were quite good. Bob Johnson out rolled enemy planes all the time. Fred Christensen related a combat he was in with Adolf Galland where they ended up doinf circular elevtor turns neither gaining on the other. The Jug literally held its own against a 109 in that respect. This is out of the mouth of one of the top P-47 aces to me.

There are accounts of wild turning combats at tree top level P-47 versus 109s or 190s. Don Gentile related an account of one of those and survived. The dry and stuffy figures that claim "The P-XX has a turning radius of XX at XXX MPH at XX,XXX altitude," are just so much data for data's sake. Since combats don't take place in vacuums under clinical conditions we will find surprising outcomes when we factor in pilots audacious and aggressiveness.

Just don't believe everything you hear about alleged performance limitations.
 
I know the P47 (and the P38) had an effective turbocharger system that maintained a flat power rating throughout any altitude.

I wonder if the F4U had a similar system?
 
The P-47D can maintain all of it's power up to about 28,000ft. The Corsair can maintain 2,000hp up to 19,000ft and by 25,000ft, she's down to 1,550hp.

The Corsair was never designed to be a high altitude aircraft.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

J
P-47D Thunderbolt, 'The Madam', 387th FS, 365th FG
Replies
2
Views
653
JulianHale
J
S
Adherent or Mafia?
Replies
6
Views
942
Shortround6
S
K
B-25G and B-25H information on spent 75mm cartridges - through hatch or port?
Replies
14
Views
1K
ThomasP
T
O
F4U-4 Corsair contribution in WW2
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
nuuumannn
V
P-51Ds over Normandy June 1944
Replies
1
Views
621
Geoffrey Sinclair
G
Menu
Log in
Register