P-51 B/C/D service deployment and strenght

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Tante Ju

Banned
664
12
Jan 24, 2011
Hi,

I would like to know if anybody has any information regarding the deployment of Merlin P-51s. In particular, I am interested in how the P-51 frontline strenght developed during 1944, i.e. how fast were the early four gun B models were replaced by later D models. On pictures and videos one can typically see D Mustangs, but to me it seems likely that for a while early Bs and Ds were operated in a mixed fashion, with some units still operating B Mustangs. In short, is there some kind of information on how the relative numbers of these subtypes related to each other and how fast the D model Mustang replaced the earlier types?

Thanks in advance!
 
Well according to Wikipedia North American P-51 variants - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

B/C's arrived October 43, D's mid 1944. Production of B (2000 units) C (1750 units) D (8102 units)


It mentions at the end of the P51d and P51k section that

The P-51D/P-51K started arriving in Europe in mid-1944 and quickly became the primary USAAF fighter in the theater. It was produced in larger numbers than any other Mustang variant. Nevertheless, by the end of the war, roughly half of all operational Mustangs were still P-51B or P-51C models

Now that blows my mind . Surely these B/C's where not in front line units ???????????
 
Hi,

I would like to know if anybody has any information regarding the deployment of Merlin P-51s. In particular, I am interested in how the P-51 frontline strenght developed during 1944, i.e. how fast were the early four gun B models were replaced by later D models. On pictures and videos one can typically see D Mustangs, but to me it seems likely that for a while early Bs and Ds were operated in a mixed fashion, with some units still operating B Mustangs. In short, is there some kind of information on how the relative numbers of these subtypes related to each other and how fast the D model Mustang replaced the earlier types?

I can give you the general info. Short answer - all the first block of 400 P-51B-1NA went to Europe to equip 8th and 9th AF Fighter groups. The RAF then received 308 P-51B-5 and -10NA plus 683 of the P-51C-5NT through -10NT through July 1944. By June 1944 1750 P-51C's and 1988 P-51B's had been produced and delivered to USAAF and RAF.

The P-51B/C fought on through the end of the war although only 20% of the Mustang force in ETO/MTO were B/C types by January 1944.

The 8th AF lost 1380 P-51B/C/D/K destroyed or written off from all causes

Virtually all the P-51B's and C's went to England and Italy but the MTO didn't start getting any P-51s until late April. By July 1984 all the P-51B-15NA and P-51C-10NT had been shipped around the world to PTO, MTO and ETO but the P-51D-5NA first arrived in ETO for 4th and 354th FG in late May, 1944 but didn't see combat until early June.

All of the victory credits to Mustangs were P-51B/C/Mark III types prior to D-Day with perhaps a few Mk II credits. It was solely the P-51B that battled the LW from December 1943 through May 1944


Thanks in advance!

The P-51D's were allocated evenly between MTO and ETO in the late July to August 1944 but thereafter the ETO FG's got about 2/3 of the European allocations and the PTO started getting their Mustangs in the summer of 1944, along with the RAAF license built P-51D/Mark IV's..
 
Are there any figures or data available as to what percentage of Mustangs were allocated to the CBI?
I've see a couple of pictures of weather-battered P-51s sporting the famous shark teeth nose art in the Far East but have not been able to find any substantial data so far.
 
Are there any figures or data available as to what percentage of Mustangs were allocated to the CBI?
I've see a couple of pictures of weather-battered P-51s sporting the famous shark teeth nose art in the Far East but have not been able to find any substantial data so far.

I haven't had the time to go through the data available at USAFHRC in the 'tub files' - I suspect you would have to do Kentucky windage and look at 23rd, 2nd Air Commando, 5th Provisional, 15th, 35th, 51st, 311th FG deployment/assignments.
 
Well according to Wikipedia North American P-51 variants - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

B/C's arrived October 43, D's mid 1944. Production of B (20001988 including Mark III units) C (1750 units including Mark III) D (8102 D/K/Mark IV/F-6 - 8202 plus 200 RAAF Mark IV's units)


It mentions at the end of the P51d and P51k section that



Now that blows my mind . Surely these B/C's where not in front line units ???????????

Heck yes they were. A lot of P-51 pilots liked the performance better than the D-s but the D/K was probably a better combat fighter all around, whereas the B/C had better performance but less range and firepower and visibility. Having said that, the B/C's were rapidly being phased out in fall 1944 as WW or RTU/Clobber College mounts and the operational ones were largely being flown by F/O and 2nd Lts.

Note that the P-51B/C had wing pylons stressed to only 500 pound (75 gallons tank) load. They did, however carry 110 gallon fuel tanks in selected long range escorts but careful to not do much while tanks still full.
 
Last edited:
It is interesting to compare the the late '44 P-51B/C with the excellent Fw-190D-9. While not as heavily armed as the Fw, the performance of the P-51 compares favorably to the Fw in airspeed and climb from SL to 20k where the P-51B/C starts having much better performance. The P-51B/C was a formidable fighter to the end of the war.
 
The D-9 was sort of a hour late, dollar short fighter.
It's level of performance was offered by Allied fighters a year earlier; in the important altitude belt (20-30000 ft) the D-9 was lagging behind. The D-9 was matched in LW by the DB-605AS/ASM engined versions of the BF-109 some 5 months earlier. The performance gain vs. 1942 Bf-109s was negligible, admittedly the D-9 carrying more weaponry (but still not a bomber busting arsenal).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back