Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The aluminum used on the Zero was very similar, if not the same as 24T or in todays world 2024 T3 or T6. I don't believe Magnesium was part of the alloy, zinc seems to be the major alloying element. In the old threads we have a very lengthy discussion about this, I even took pictures of various WW2 aircraft skins for a comparison. If I remember right the Zero's skin ranged from about .030 to .060. Us aircraft was from .030 to .125 depending on the aircraft and the loaction on the skin.For years, I heard that one of the reasons why the Zero was so flammable was a high concentration of magnesium in the aluminum alloy they used. It was VERY light, but made the metal brittle and flammable. Does anyone know the mixture they used for the alloy? VS the mixture in most US WWII aluminum? Also, how thick was the skin of the A6M vs US aircraft?
For years, I heard that one of the reasons why the Zero was so flammable was a high concentration of magnesium in the aluminum alloy they used. It was VERY light, but made the metal brittle and flammable. Does anyone know the mixture they used for the alloy? VS the mixture in most US WWII aluminum? Also, how thick was the skin of the A6M vs US aircraft?
It would require an Extraordinary concentration of magnesium for the Aluminum ally to be 'flammable' per se... w/o knowing all the facts I would give most of the credit to lack of armor plating for fuel cells..
Magnesium was used in some areas but was not part of the aluminum alloying. Brake caliper castings and some other parts were probably magnesium but 90% of the airframe was aluminum.Im VERY sure that magnesium was a part of the A6M's alloy. You can find a few sources on the net about it. Later on, the US made a few aircraft made of just magnesium. The B-29's cylinder heads, XP-56 prototype, and B-36. So its not unheard of.
Aluminum itself is flammable under the correct conditions, and adding magnesium lowers its burn temp a lot. From what I recall, tracer rounds could set the A6M's wings alight due to its high heat, and the magnesium would keep the flame alive even in 300MPH wings. Add fuel, and or fuel vapor, and you have a very bad situation for the pilot.
2024 - Aluminum and .20% copper by weight T3 - solution heat treated, T-4 solution heat treated and artificially aged. T-6 solution heat treated and then cold worked....Gibbage - I don't doubt that a magnesium alloyed aluminum would more easily sustain a local ignition due to API or Incindiery - but would you really pose that as more of a reason for a flamer as a couple of hits in an unprotected fuel tank?
Alclad 'back in the day' was 2024-T3,T4 and T6 - I will dig in the old material properties to see what I can see but doubt I will find much verification for you.
I designed around a lot of 2024 and 7075 plus some 6063 and 64 when welding was important but don't recall any high mag properties for those?
The reason the wings would burst into flames with a tracer round is simple, no self sealing fuel tanks. There is practically no armor in the Zero either. Once a tracer round hits avgas, you have a torch.
No.....My question really is not if they were easy to shoot down, but if there was magnesium in the skin.
My question really is not if they were easy to shoot down, but if there was magnesium in the skin.
The XP-56 was made from Magnesium - that's all she wrote!You asked if the reason the Zero was so flammable because of magnesium in the skin. The question was answered and then some.
No aircraft was made completely of magnesium. Magnesium parts, like wheels, yes, but the entire aircraft, no.
The XP-56 was made from Magnesium - that's all she wrote!