Admiral Beez
Major
The British Empire peaked 100 years ago this month
Two new books examine the history and consequences of colonialism
www.economist.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Its amazing that some historian manages to mention Brexit among all the other hobby horses he had a trot around on.It's amazing that with the taking of Palestine in 1923 the Empire was at its height.
I ignored the Brexit plug. I'm in Canada, but all of my UK relatives voted to exit. They're in finance and trade and knew it was going to be an economic challenge.Its amazing that some historian manages to mention Brexit among all the other hobby horses he had a trot around on.
The rest of it is equally revisionist nonsense, the British empire was quite clearly not at its height in 1923 unless you completely ignore WW1 and its effects and the Boer War and its effects, basically you have to ignore all historical facts.I ignored the Brexit plug. I'm in Canada, but all of my UK relatives voted to exit. They're in finance and trade and knew it was going to be an economic challenge.
It was at its geographic height. I don't see the nonsense, but mind; my knickers are clearly unknotted.The rest of it is equally revisionist nonsense, the British empire was quite clearly not at its height in 1923
More like 12-10-1941The rest of it is equally revisionist nonsense, the British empire was quite clearly not at its height in 1923 unless you completely ignore WW1 and its effects and the Boer War and its effects, basically you have to ignore all historical facts.
Dont forget ww1 and the price it was paying for that one.The British Empire started it's decline after WWII.
The loss of South East Asian colonies courtesy of Japan, the turmoil in the Middle East, India's independence and a staggering price tag of two world wars are what shuttered the Empire.
Agreed. WW1 was a massive economic and psychological shock to the Empire.Dont forget ww1 and the price it was paying for that one.
It doesn't. Most Empires fail due to overextending. Bigger yes, stronger no. The article was remarking on the Empire's pinnacle of size, not viability.Palestine was an area slightly smaller than Scotland and full of trouble. How does taking control of it make the Empire stronger
A certain British Army Officer*, in the early 1920s, said (in regards to the various war-end treaties and international agreements)Britain and France took possession of Middle Eastern territories after the fall of the Ottoman Empire.
That area was always a potential hotbed of trouble. The Ottomans and local Sultans had traditional ways of handling the people, which the French and British lacked.
After the "War to end War" they seem to have been pretty successful in Paris at making a "Peace to end Peace".