Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Gentlemen, There have recently been two articles in aircraft magazines "celebrating" the 25th anniversary of the conflict.
Post the war she gained huge public support and went on to become re-elected. It should be easy enough to check on anyway.
Without wanting to become embroiled in political turmoil I was in the UK at the time and from memory there was some talk after the event that the war was an election winner for Margaret Thatcher who (again from memory) was in some degree of political trouble prior to the war, and was unlikely to win the next election. Post the war she gained huge public support and went on to become re-elected. It should be easy enough to check on anyway.
I believe avoidable .
You said you did'nt want to get involved in politics then straight away do just that. Its pretty obvious CB how you stand.
your favourite subject is The Falklands you do tend to make it sound like it was a much larger conflict than it was, perhaps because Argentine has'nt been in any wars outside its own boarders for yonks ,fair enough.
But I stand elsewhere, I don't decry any of the service personnel involved they did their duty and 907 very sadly lost their lives however it was a small conflict and I believe avoidable hence my total dislike of Thatcher and Galtieri
I remember some of what went on then. As I remember,the Argintines did a bang up job. And I believe (my opinion) if it were not for the U.S.A. things might have turned out quite different.
Smaller than Irak ? More avoidable that Irak? hmmmmm.
Of course it was smaller than Iraq, military death toll alone is currently just on 4000.
The Falkland Islanders consider themselves British and that is that.
I have no probs with CB standing up for his country and feeling pride for some of the achievements of his armed forces. The pilots were as brave as brave can be.
If he continues to post articles and pix from his side then it will give a more balanced view on the whole conflict.
Personally I believe that this thread has been an example of how things should be undertaken.
Politics have been kept out of it and the communications have been kept to the facts. Indeed there have been a number of entries where CB and others have presented the position as they have seen it and by comparing both sides of the point in question, a better understanding has arisen for all participants.
Give and take has taken place with good grace and no one has been blind to the facts or dogmatic.
As the driving force behind the thread, I believe that CB deserves a lot of credit for this
I have to ask... What in your opinion did the US contribute?
I think the Brits got some Vulcan spare parts out of a US museum...
The General Belgrano used to be the USS Phoenix which survived Pearl Harbor. (It's odd to think that the English torpedeod a pearl Harbor survivor!)