Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I read with interest your info regarding the attachk on HMS Argonaut.
I was Heavily involved in this attack in being on the flightdeck of the ship at the time.
The MB339 came out of the sun and fired Rockets and followed through with a short burst of cannon, these went through the 965 radar and ran accross the hangar roof (I heard the rounds strike as we ran inside.
I have attached a picture of the Ships Flightdeck Crew, this was taken very shortly before the launch of the Lynx moments before the 1st attack.
For those Interested I am the one with the orange mug on my waist in the middle of the picture
The guys on the left are the same as the rest of us, "Jumpy" towards the end of out time there we are even getting excited seeing seagulls oftem mistaking them for distant aircraft - You get like that sometimes.
I have been reading some of the post in this threa, and have to say that it is a very impressive thread. I feel humbled by the depth of knowlewdge, and the fairness in the assessment.
I have to ask a question, and hopefully wont tread on any toes by doing that. I have always been an avid fan of the Sea Harrier, and have read in various accounts that they were responsible for shooting down something like 29 argentinian aircraft. They owed something of their success to two things, the sidewinders they were carrying, and their ability to "VIFF".
Is any of this true, or am i completely mistaken. If I am mistaken, to what extent was the british carrier air power affecting the air battle over the TF?
I have been reading some of the post in this threa, and have to say that it is a very impressive thread. I feel humbled by the depth of knowlewdge, and the fairness in the assessment.
I have been reading some of the post in this threa, and have to say that it is a very impressive thread. I feel humbled by the depth of knowlewdge, and the fairness in the assessment.
I have to ask a question, and hopefully wont tread on any toes by doing that. I have always been an avid fan of the Sea Harrier, and have read in various accounts that they were responsible for shooting down something like 29 argentinian aircraft. They owed something of their success to two things, the sidewinders they were carrying, and their ability to "VIFF".
Is any of this true, or am i completely mistaken. If I am mistaken, to what extent was the british carrier air power affecting the air battle over the TF
Is worth to mention than before the war started some british pilots fought simulated battles between Sea Harrier and Mirage IIIE of the Armee del Air and the differences were not as big as later found in the Malvinas /Falklands war.
Those differences were probably explained by
a) The sidewinder L
b) The tactical situation, particulary the limited autonomy over the islands that the Argentine Mirages IIIEA ( 5 to ten minutes)
I have been reading some of the post in this threa, and have to say that it is a very impressive thread. I feel humbled by the depth of knowlewdge, and the fairness in the assessment.
Well said mate. I was working on vulcans at the time.Their were 4 RAF Harriers shoot down. parsifal The sea harriers will still be flying in 2013,they are being MODed.
We were equipped with A4-Gs in the '70s, which carried as standard AIM-9 sidewinders on our FAA aircraft. We used to train to use our A-4s as air defence aircraft, as well as strike aircraft. We had only iron bombs at the time. The A-4s we thought were pretty good at their job. As a trainee, I watched several "hypothetical" excercises at the tac warfare school (a huge ampitheatre building with this massive computer that allowed us to simulate battle situations for training purposes. An enormous playstation inother words), that pitted the A-4s against aircraft of our near neighbours. Our Indonesian neighbour at the time had 16 ex-CAC f-86s, and a number of Mig-17s, Mig-19s and a few Mig-21s. I remeber the A-4s were considered competent against everything except the Mig-21s, and the Mig-19s were considered a bit of a habdful if they were missile armed.
I knew that the sidewinders were a major source of attrition against the Argentinians, but have never quite understood why the argentinians did not carry their own (or did they???). Also, didnt the Miragee IIIs carry matra air to air as well. If so, why werent they used.
In the RAAF we too had Mirage IIIs, which were equipped with matra, I believe the RAAF did not think much of the system. The general consensus in the RAAF was that the MIIIs were good aerodynamically, but fairly simple and austere in the electronics area.
What were the Argentinian observations???
Here ..Here.. On that statement...
And me being a dumb American..For some reason I was thinking the Falklands was not a big deal ..I know ,,I know It was called a war for a reason ..War is well .........War..duh.....But at the time it was going on the American News just past it off as no biggie...... ...
I hate the news ...
My respect to both sides and those who were there