OK guys, its November 1945 and the dust is settling. What decisions do you make for the RAF over the next 5 years or so?
Bombers - I actually think the RAF (by which of course I mean the Air Ministry) got this one right. There is little, if any, money. You have a bomber force equipped with newly built Lancasters after weeding out the older surviving airframes, and Lincolns are coming down the line. An improvement, but not all that different really. There is no possibility of a B-50 class bomber being designed and built in the UK before it is already obsolete, the advent of jets mean that is a no brainer, so you buy 2nd hand B-29s from the USA for your first high altitude pressurised bomber, and launch the development of a new class of bomber using every mod con you can think of - the V bombers while the quicker development of the less risky Canberra goes ahead. Yes, I would do the same.
The only thing I think I would do differently is that I would not buy all three, but neither can I narrow it down to just one as the Vulcan offers Lancaster-like versatility and remarkable agility, while the Victor offers greater range and payload by a huge margin - tough one. I suppose if I absolutely had to pick one I would go for an all Victor force. I would regret it after 1964, but I wouldn't know that yet. The Valiant would remain a short run prototype like the Sperrin
Fighters - I would curtail all contracts for the Meteor and Vampire day fighters after 1947 and order a service version of theHawker P.1052 for the RAF and P.1040 for the RN at high priority, this could be in service by 1950 (instead of the Meteor F.8 ) though the Meteor NF would continue to replace the Mossie NF but this time they would be built by Gloster. AW would still built the Sea Hawk, with the swept P.1052 'Hotspur' built by Hawker, with the Mk 2 being an all-swept model (equivalent to the real life P.1081)
The Hawker P.1067 would be limited to an interim research prototype with the P.1083 being developed as the RAF's transonic fighter in the F-100/MiG 19/ Super Mystere class.
I would like to think I would scrap the Swift, but I feel that in reality I would not know any better and expect Supermarine to get it right, though I would at least allow them to fly the 545 as a possible alternative to the 1083 Transonic Hunter.
What would you do? Also, please dont feel restricted to these two categories, this is just to get things moving.
edit - just to explain my Hawker plan, I see the P.1081 'Hotspur Mk2' and P.1067 as flying concurrently in 1951, but with the former being quickly deployed operationally thnaks to a high degree of commonality with its predecessor and the latter serving as a subsonic bridging prototype for the P.1083 which would be produced as the Hunter and enter service in 1955-56, which in fact, it was intended to in real life.
T he result of which would be no need for the RAF to have to introduce the F-86 in 1953 because all its fighters are obsolete.
Bombers - I actually think the RAF (by which of course I mean the Air Ministry) got this one right. There is little, if any, money. You have a bomber force equipped with newly built Lancasters after weeding out the older surviving airframes, and Lincolns are coming down the line. An improvement, but not all that different really. There is no possibility of a B-50 class bomber being designed and built in the UK before it is already obsolete, the advent of jets mean that is a no brainer, so you buy 2nd hand B-29s from the USA for your first high altitude pressurised bomber, and launch the development of a new class of bomber using every mod con you can think of - the V bombers while the quicker development of the less risky Canberra goes ahead. Yes, I would do the same.
The only thing I think I would do differently is that I would not buy all three, but neither can I narrow it down to just one as the Vulcan offers Lancaster-like versatility and remarkable agility, while the Victor offers greater range and payload by a huge margin - tough one. I suppose if I absolutely had to pick one I would go for an all Victor force. I would regret it after 1964, but I wouldn't know that yet. The Valiant would remain a short run prototype like the Sperrin
Fighters - I would curtail all contracts for the Meteor and Vampire day fighters after 1947 and order a service version of theHawker P.1052 for the RAF and P.1040 for the RN at high priority, this could be in service by 1950 (instead of the Meteor F.8 ) though the Meteor NF would continue to replace the Mossie NF but this time they would be built by Gloster. AW would still built the Sea Hawk, with the swept P.1052 'Hotspur' built by Hawker, with the Mk 2 being an all-swept model (equivalent to the real life P.1081)
The Hawker P.1067 would be limited to an interim research prototype with the P.1083 being developed as the RAF's transonic fighter in the F-100/MiG 19/ Super Mystere class.
I would like to think I would scrap the Swift, but I feel that in reality I would not know any better and expect Supermarine to get it right, though I would at least allow them to fly the 545 as a possible alternative to the 1083 Transonic Hunter.
What would you do? Also, please dont feel restricted to these two categories, this is just to get things moving.
edit - just to explain my Hawker plan, I see the P.1081 'Hotspur Mk2' and P.1067 as flying concurrently in 1951, but with the former being quickly deployed operationally thnaks to a high degree of commonality with its predecessor and the latter serving as a subsonic bridging prototype for the P.1083 which would be produced as the Hunter and enter service in 1955-56, which in fact, it was intended to in real life.
T he result of which would be no need for the RAF to have to introduce the F-86 in 1953 because all its fighters are obsolete.
Last edited: